From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>, <toke@redhat.com>,
<lorenzo@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<stfomichev@gmail.com>,
<syzbot+ff145014d6b0ce64a173@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Octavian Purdila <tavip@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] xdp: update xdp_rxq_info's mem type in XDP generic hook
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 19:53:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPZ3FvcIVOPVxQum@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <025d2281-caf0-4f88-8f31-b0bfa5596aec@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 05:36:06PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:20:57 +0200
>
> >
> >
> > On 17/10/2025 16.31, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> >> Currently, generic XDP hook uses xdp_rxq_info from netstack Rx queues
> >> which do not have its XDP memory model registered. There is a case when
> >> XDP program calls bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() BPF helper, which in turn
> >> releases underlying memory. This happens when it consumes enough amount
> >> of bytes and when XDP buffer has fragments. For this action the memory
> >> model knowledge passed to XDP program is crucial so that core can call
> >> suitable function for freeing/recycling the page.
> >>
> >> For netstack queues it defaults to MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED (0) due to lack
> >> of mem model registration. The problem we're fixing here is when kernel
> >> copied the skb to new buffer backed by system's page_pool and XDP buffer
> >> is built around it. Then when bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() calls
> >> __xdp_return(), it acts incorrectly due to mem type not being set to
> >> MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL and causes a page leak.
> >>
> >
> > Does the code not set the skb->pp_recycle ?
Hi Jesper,
yes it does and I based on this my initial solution, however Jakub had
concerns:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251001082737.23f5037f@kernel.org/
>
> You mean this CoW code which replaces the buffers in the skb with system
> PP-backed ones?
skb_pp_cow_data() takes arbitrary page_pool as an input, it does not imply
we're gonna be dealing with system pp only. veth provides its own and
generic xdp uses system pp (the two existing skb_pp_cow_data() callsites).
> Maybe that's the problem (I don't remember the details of the function)?
>
> >
> >> Pull out the existing code from bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp() that
> >> init/prepares xdp_buff onto new helper xdp_convert_skb_to_buff() and
> >> embed there rxq's mem_type initialization that is assigned to xdp_buff.
>
> [...]
>
> >> + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> >> + skb_shinfo(skb)->xdp_frags_size = skb->data_len;
> >> + xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp);
> >> + } else {
> >> + xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(xdp);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > The SKB should be marked via skb->pp_recycle, but I guess you are trying
> > to catch code that doesn't set this correctly?
> > (Slightly worried this will "paper-over" some other buggy code?)
> >
> >> + xdp->rxq->mem.type = page_pool_page_is_pp(virt_to_page(xdp->data)) ?
>
> BTW this may return incorrect results if the page is not order-0.
> IIRC system PPs always return order-0 pages, what about veth code etc?
veth's pp works on order-0 pages well, however I agree it would be better
to use virt_to_head_page() here.
>
> >> + MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL : MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED;
> >> +}
> >
> > In the beginning PP_MAGIC / PP_SIGNATURE was primarily used as a
> > debugging feature to catch faulty code that released pp pages to the
> > real page allocator. It seems to have evolved into something more
> > critical. Someone also tried to elevate this into a page flag, which
> > would make this more reliable.
exactly here we have the very same issue and we need to correctly return
pages back to their originating page pool.
> Thanks,
> Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 14:31 [PATCH v2 bpf 0/2] xdp: fix page_pool leaks Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] xdp: update xdp_rxq_info's mem type in XDP generic hook Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-17 16:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-10-20 11:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-10-20 15:36 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-10-20 17:53 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-10-22 1:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-22 11:22 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-22 14:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] veth: update mem type in xdp_buff Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-17 16:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-10-17 16:52 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-17 17:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-10-17 18:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-10-17 20:08 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-20 10:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPZ3FvcIVOPVxQum@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+ff145014d6b0ce64a173@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tavip@google.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).