From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFCC25A338 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761634201; cv=none; b=iQGP/A0AX2UJXSK2C1RPz4hDtncSGjnEsNiry40N9eUvbanogDZYK/LP5SYbnbtvVUpvnCEm8l43U7dAw7+CPJHwqTV+1akCeV3BTSn5Os9QbPo8Wpsz23KYJ7BI8J1/90N3c0hP0ReYK5lDG94/Le1bnLz84sLNu0zaVaRdiCc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761634201; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z8JSE90sLOXsXd2jX7h+KEJcQX4isNsOMiPrcW6rBF8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X/5r71ertWQGAmdttnSy2A1Ba1RFLd/mWrPDH6z7vHxs1k0BXSm0nmQMOkN8vXYhbA1/kync2uBFi4RsXOqxU69JU2rMNP3mUm7FClvkm4hr12+UfwLHjGQgdn4XIO56xoBQ3SfKWI62fmnhC5aZdxBwHCVJrS2nYdNoRk2Bt7k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b=aKkauwwV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b="aKkauwwV" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F81207B2; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:49:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3RrBwkiLgzY; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from EXCH-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.32.0.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AFE1205E5; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:49:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com 2AFE1205E5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1761634197; bh=E4MYS6q5iVvdMMW6b+U4PVZxb2qMRuZrdrCn2r7XH3g=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aKkauwwVUBwvBU1R469/ojaEP5NshN29xbYkbvpajoXw9hecEo8TEtCwcWf3sruTT ywtqEkNa9SJ327wAgWvbXWWRfUPFcT2P9oomCFdWqjfAvco9+iq9wizO+KlbwtVVyo Nu/11A700RORg4jGf12T1mXDdRu7acIb8YLHMyRxgdw4a2ZYD+dQPG0R/7b44sNMrD jhut7e9d0EXCtLXza9ugvJKviIZchMhq77XCFSgm/FNFXgo1J+hTvS5DcSZKMIqE1W 6CcxA4xiMFjidgY6hs05GAJiED7ZOJy/3EbqPmfrIJsItsueqIEP3+kFDJj2IFLDEJ cs99niiQxa72g== Received: from secunet.com (10.182.7.193) by EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.2.2562.17; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:49:56 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 1364292 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 06:49:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:49:56 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Jianbo Liu CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] xfrm: IPsec hardware offload performance improvements Message-ID: References: <20251021014016.4673-1-jianbol@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021014016.4673-1-jianbol@nvidia.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:35:41AM +0300, Jianbo Liu wrote: > This patch series optimizes IPsec crypto offload performance by > addressing a lock contention bottleneck using RSS. > > The first patch refactors the xfrm_input to avoid a costly > unlock/relock cycle. > > The second patch builds on this by removing a redundant replay check, > which is unnecessary for the synchronous hardware path. > > Jianbo Liu (2): > xfrm: Refactor xfrm_input lock to reduce contention with RSS > xfrm: Skip redundant replay recheck for the hardware offload path Series applied to ipsec-next, thanks Jianbo!