From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF382E92A3; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761757142; cv=none; b=P/+dyfd1upwwn+wrfni1CgX0E1gtp0BU6y3/WX5qHD0yq9vpif8tNu/ngi+UN2VaJo2EA6VoaT3jbpJRb/D8t9MUvbyUjRoUT+7Np4jOg8gJwxSSDZFv/wdE/lN5rEVpjzqsRwLGmqqZcS8rqGUCp85m8tg9BUyFHFvSTTd88n8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761757142; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u7JL73WEYd6ERmhJ3D+IDILnoF8DaZzfbL0v+3g5Bq4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aQztByYmnEosVMbyWTZH4G7kFYxsd23QHWwSzWY25ZeQajpxZ+rCfSBPlmySua/8V9iATmuKodvrX44H5hFq7ZZQeAR/u52uGXMSuYJkWmnmNzkhfcwQUl8LrF3iohy0o1tIba9Q3Lknd5fl3H+tHB1DjhyhOU6sGdCVPCRGjwQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bkVG195N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bkVG195N" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C406EC4CEF7; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:58:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761757140; bh=u7JL73WEYd6ERmhJ3D+IDILnoF8DaZzfbL0v+3g5Bq4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bkVG195Nbcnv1hIbCaCNw0APxUUbifnb35ndDLCkDA12Rl8N4G256v20Cij3pFy5K 9stQkqO8dXcHRAwSA/MwIj6SKbwzUvlobkW5Ae7Cw4edhiJDr1yJanPldUG/CEi77f hy8Zveutja6gDYce/RAocR/nEvfbVytIeIGKCYK/4E6tgm0Q6yo4NVk+D9bgPg38EK XK8KT1FNh69KnjmuKMeWwm3Ad06A7PYV6+5yGZEETCVbOsPlmzHWCyDXTn6kOQVb+t zhmUHCynkTZRME8DrXDHvI62m42Pz1+bxEa9CPbmpG0f9NT2D1WmUIx5xD4nKng5JK qLZUtjCLbcH4A== Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:58:56 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Bobby Eshleman Cc: Stefano Garzarella , Shuah Khan , Jakub Kicinski , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] selftests/vsock: do not unconditionally die if qemu fails Message-ID: References: <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-0-edeb179d6463@meta.com> <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-5-edeb179d6463@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-5-edeb179d6463@meta.com> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 06:00:09PM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > From: Bobby Eshleman > > If QEMU fails to boot, then set the returncode (via timeout) instead of > unconditionally dying. This is in preparation for tests that expect QEMU > to fail to boot. In that case, we just want to know if the boot failed > or not so we can test the pass/fail criteria, and continue executing the > next test. > > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Reviewed-by: Simon Horman