From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Reorganize airoha_queue struct
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 08:53:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQsCYoS-cvkUjrMv@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104183200.41b4b853@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3500 bytes --]
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:27:56 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Do not allocate memory for rx-only fields for hw tx queues and for tx-only
> > fields for hw rx queues.
>
> Could you share more details (pahole)
> Given that napi_struct is in the same struct, 20B is probably not going
> to make much difference?
I agree the difference is not huge, I added this patch mainly for code
readability. If you prefer I can drop the patch, I do not have a strong
opinion about it. What do you think?
net-next:
struct airoha_queue {
struct airoha_qdma * qdma; /* 0 8 */
spinlock_t lock; /* 8 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct airoha_queue_entry * entry; /* 16 8 */
struct airoha_qdma_desc * desc; /* 24 8 */
u16 head; /* 32 2 */
u16 tail; /* 34 2 */
int queued; /* 36 4 */
int ndesc; /* 40 4 */
int free_thr; /* 44 4 */
int buf_size; /* 48 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct napi_struct napi __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 56 496 */
/* XXX last struct has 1 hole */
/* --- cacheline 8 boundary (512 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */
struct page_pool * page_pool; /* 552 8 */
struct sk_buff * skb; /* 560 8 */
/* size: 568, cachelines: 9, members: 13 */
/* sum members: 560, holes: 2, sum holes: 8 */
/* member types with holes: 1, total: 1 */
/* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 4 */
/* last cacheline: 56 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
net-next + airoha_queue reorg:
struct airoha_queue {
struct airoha_qdma * qdma; /* 0 8 */
spinlock_t lock; /* 8 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct airoha_queue_entry * entry; /* 16 8 */
struct airoha_qdma_desc * desc; /* 24 8 */
int queued; /* 32 4 */
int ndesc; /* 36 4 */
struct napi_struct napi __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 40 496 */
/* XXX last struct has 1 hole */
/* --- cacheline 8 boundary (512 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */
union {
struct {
u16 head; /* 536 2 */
u16 tail; /* 538 2 */
int buf_size; /* 540 4 */
struct page_pool * page_pool; /* 544 8 */
struct sk_buff * skb; /* 552 8 */
}; /* 536 24 */
struct {
struct list_head tx_list; /* 536 16 */
int free_thr; /* 552 4 */
}; /* 536 24 */
}; /* 536 24 */
/* size: 560, cachelines: 9, members: 8 */
/* sum members: 556, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
/* member types with holes: 1, total: 1 */
/* forced alignments: 1 */
/* last cacheline: 48 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
Regards,
Lorenzo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 10:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: airoha: Allow mapping out-of-order DMA tx descriptors Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-11-03 10:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: airoha: Add the capability to consume " Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-11-03 23:32 ` Jacob Keller
2025-11-05 2:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-05 8:18 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-11-03 10:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Reorganize airoha_queue struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-11-03 23:36 ` Jacob Keller
2025-11-05 2:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-05 7:53 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2025-11-06 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-06 8:27 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQsCYoS-cvkUjrMv@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).