From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: chuang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:21:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQtdgLFnZ7Qjsnjw@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACueBy7yNo4jq4HbiLXn0ez14w8CUTtTpPHmpSB-Ou6jhhNypA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 11:09:08AM +0800, chuang wrote:
> From 35dbc9abd8da820007391b707bd2c1a9c99ee67d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 02:52:11 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding
> stale fnhe
I'm unable to apply the patch:
$ b4 am -o - CACueBy7yNo4jq4HbiLXn0ez14w8CUTtTpPHmpSB-Ou6jhhNypA@mail.gmail.com | git am
[...]
Applying: ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe
error: corrupt patch at line 10
Patch failed at 0001 ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe
Did you use git send-email?
>
> A race condition exists between fnhe_remove_oldest() and
> rt_bind_exception() where a fnhe that is scheduled for removal can be
> rebound to a new dst.
>
> The issue occurs when fnhe_remove_oldest() selects an fnhe (fnheX)
> for deletion, but before it can be flushed and freed via RCU,
> CPU 0 enters rt_bind_exception() and attempts to reuse the entry.
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> __mkroute_output()
> find_exception() [fnheX]
> update_or_create_fnhe()
> fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX]
> rt_bind_exception() [bind dst]
> RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak]
>
> If rt_bind_exception() successfully binds fnheX to a new dst, the
> newly bound dst will never be properly freed because fnheX will
> soon be released by the RCU callback, leading to a permanent
> reference count leak on the old dst and the device.
>
> This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a
> warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device:
>
> unregister_netdevice: waiting for ethX to become free. Usage count = N
Can you say more about how you debugged this? It seems like a very rare
race condition. I expect netdevice_tracker to only show that a dst entry
took a reference on the net device, but it wouldn't show who took a
reference on the dst entry.
>
> Fix this race by clearing 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling
> fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field,
> setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and
> bound to a new dst just before it is freed.
Seems safe given that both fnhe_remove_oldest() and rt_bind_exception()
access 'fnhe_daddr' while holding 'fnhe_lock'. Same trick was used in
commit ee60ad219f5c ("route: set the deleted fnhe fnhe_daddr to 0 in
ip_del_fnhe to fix a race").
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 67d6d681e15b ("ipv4: make exception cache less predictible")
> Signed-off-by: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/route.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 6d27d3610c1c..b549d6a57307 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -607,6 +607,11 @@ static void fnhe_remove_oldest(struct
> fnhe_hash_bucket *hash)
> oldest_p = fnhe_p;
> }
> }
> +
> + /* Clear oldest->fnhe_daddr to prevent this fnhe from being
> + * rebound with new dsts in rt_bind_exception().
> + */
> + oldest->fnhe_daddr = 0;
> fnhe_flush_routes(oldest);
> *oldest_p = oldest->fnhe_next;
> kfree_rcu(oldest, rcu);
> --
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 3:09 [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe chuang
2025-11-05 14:21 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2025-11-05 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-11-05 15:34 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-11-05 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-11-06 0:31 ` chuang
2025-11-07 9:53 ` chuang
2025-11-09 15:48 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQtdgLFnZ7Qjsnjw@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nashuiliang@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).