netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: "Waiman Long" <llong@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Gabriele Monaco" <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Marco Crivellari" <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:18:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQtqrYlvMsjX91Vn@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14cd347c-42c9-4134-9c1c-1a222b553c2f@huaweicloud.com>

Le Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 10:22:47AM +0800, Chen Ridong a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 2025/11/1 0:17, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Le Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 12:03:05AM -0400, Waiman Long a écrit :
> >> On 10/20/25 9:46 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2025/10/14 4:31, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >>>> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN's cpumask will soon be made modifyable by cpuset.
> >>>> A synchronization mechanism is then needed to synchronize the updates
> >>>> with the housekeeping cpumask readers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Turn the housekeeping cpumasks into RCU pointers. Once a housekeeping
> >>>> cpumask will be modified, the update side will wait for an RCU grace
> >>>> period and propagate the change to interested subsystem when deemed
> >>>> necessary.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   kernel/sched/isolation.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >>>>   kernel/sched/sched.h     |  1 +
> >>>>   2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> >>>> index 8690fb705089..b46c20b5437f 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> >>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overridden);
> >>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_overridden);
> >>>>   struct housekeeping {
> >>>> -	cpumask_var_t cpumasks[HK_TYPE_MAX];
> >>>> +	struct cpumask __rcu *cpumasks[HK_TYPE_MAX];
> >>>>   	unsigned long flags;
> >>>>   };
> >>>> @@ -33,17 +33,28 @@ bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_enabled);
> >>>> +const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
> >>>> +		if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type)) {
> >>>> +			return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], 1);
> >>>> +		}
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +	return cpu_possible_mask;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
> >>>> +
> >>>>   int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
> >>>>   {
> >>>>   	int cpu;
> >>>>   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
> >>>>   		if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type)) {
> >>>> -			cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], smp_processor_id());
> >>>> +			cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping_cpumask(type), smp_processor_id());
> >>>>   			if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> >>>>   				return cpu;
> >>>> -			cpu = cpumask_any_and_distribute(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
> >>>> +			cpu = cpumask_any_and_distribute(housekeeping_cpumask(type), cpu_online_mask);
> >>>>   			if (likely(cpu < nr_cpu_ids))
> >>>>   				return cpu;
> >>>>   			/*
> >>>> @@ -59,28 +70,18 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_any_cpu);
> >>>> -const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
> >>>> -{
> >>>> -	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> >>>> -		if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
> >>>> -			return housekeeping.cpumasks[type];
> >>>> -	return cpu_possible_mask;
> >>>> -}
> >>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
> >>>> -
> >>>>   void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t, enum hk_type type)
> >>>>   {
> >>>>   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> >>>>   		if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
> >>>> -			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
> >>>> +			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_affine);
> >>>>   bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type)
> >>>>   {
> >>>> -	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> >>>> -		if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
> >>>> -			return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
> >>>> +	if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
> >>>> +		return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
> >>>>   	return true;
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
> >>>> @@ -96,20 +97,33 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
> >>>>   	if (housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_KERNEL_NOISE)
> >>>>   		sched_tick_offload_init();
> >>>> -
> >>>> +	/*
> >>>> +	 * Realloc with a proper allocator so that any cpumask update
> >>>> +	 * can indifferently free the old version with kfree().
> >>>> +	 */
> >>>>   	for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
> >>>> +		struct cpumask *omask, *nmask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nmask))
> >>>> +			return;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +		omask = rcu_dereference(housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
> >>>> +
> >>>>   		/* We need at least one CPU to handle housekeeping work */
> >>>> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(housekeeping.cpumasks[type]));
> >>>> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(omask));
> >>>> +		cpumask_copy(nmask, omask);
> >>>> +		RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], nmask);
> >>>> +		memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
> >>>>   	}
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
> >>>>   					   cpumask_var_t housekeeping_staging)
> >>>>   {
> >>>> +	struct cpumask *mask = memblock_alloc_or_panic(cpumask_size(), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >>>> -	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
> >>>> -	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
> >>>> -		     housekeeping_staging);
> >>>> +	cpumask_copy(mask, housekeeping_staging);
> >>>> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], mask);
> >>>>   }
> >>>>   static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
> >>>> @@ -162,7 +176,7 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
> >>>>   		for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
> >>>>   			if (!cpumask_equal(housekeeping_staging,
> >>>> -					   housekeeping.cpumasks[type])) {
> >>>> +					   housekeeping_cpumask(type))) {
> >>>>   				pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= must match isolcpus=\n");
> >>>>   				goto free_housekeeping_staging;
> >>>>   			}
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >>>> index 1f5d07067f60..0c0ef8999fd6 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> >>>>   #include <linux/ktime_api.h>
> >>>>   #include <linux/lockdep_api.h>
> >>>>   #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> >>>>   #include <linux/minmax.h>
> >>>>   #include <linux/mm.h>
> >>>>   #include <linux/module.h>
> >>> A warning was detected:
> >>>
> >>> =============================
> >>> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> >>> 6.17.0-next-20251009-00033-g4444da88969b #808 Not tainted
> >>> -----------------------------
> >>> kernel/sched/isolation.c:60 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> >>>
> >>> other info that might help us debug this:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> >>> 1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
> >>>   #0: ffff888100600ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: walk_compone
> >>>
> >>> stack backtrace:
> >>> CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.17.0-next-20251009-00033-g4
> >>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239
> >>> Call Trace:
> >>>   <TASK>
> >>>   dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
> >>>   lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x148/0x1b0
> >>>   housekeeping_cpumask+0xaa/0xb0
> >>>   housekeeping_test_cpu+0x25/0x40
> >>>   find_get_block_common+0x41/0x3e0
> >>>   bdev_getblk+0x28/0xa0
> >>>   ext4_getblk+0xba/0x2d0
> >>>   ext4_bread_batch+0x56/0x170
> >>>   __ext4_find_entry+0x17c/0x410
> >>>   ? lock_release+0xc6/0x290
> >>>   ext4_lookup+0x7a/0x1d0
> >>>   __lookup_slow+0xf9/0x1b0
> >>>   walk_component+0xe0/0x150
> >>>   link_path_walk+0x201/0x3e0
> >>>   path_openat+0xb1/0xb30
> >>>   ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x41e/0xa00
> >>>   do_filp_open+0xbc/0x170
> >>>   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
> >>>   ? __create_object+0x59/0x80
> >>>   ? trace_kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0xa0
> >>>   ? vprintk_emit+0x2b2/0x360
> >>>   do_open_execat+0x56/0x100
> >>>   alloc_bprm+0x1a/0x200
> >>>   ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> >>>   kernel_execve+0x4b/0x160
> >>>   kernel_init+0xe5/0x1c0
> >>>   ret_from_fork+0x185/0x1d0
> >>>   ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> >>>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> >>>   </TASK>
> >>> random: crng init done
> >>>
> >> It is because bh_lru_install() of fs/buffer.c calls cpu_is_isolated()
> >> without holding a rcu_read_lock. Will need to add a rcu_read_lock() there.
> > 
> > But this is called within bh_lru_lock() which should have either disabled
> > IRQs or preemption off. I would expect rcu_dereference_check() to automatically
> > verify those implied RCU read-side critical sections.
> > 
> > Let's see, lockdep_assert_in_rcu_reader() checks preemptible(), which is:
> > 
> > #define preemptible()	(preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled())
> > 
> > Ah but if !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT:
> > 
> > #define preemptible()	0
> > 
> > Chen did you have !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT ?
> > 
> > Probably lockdep_assert_in_rcu_reader() should be fixed accordingly and consider
> > preemption always disabled whenever !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT. Let me check that...
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> 
> I compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y and CONFIG_SMP=y.

Oh actually I think it's my fault. This should be fixed with this:

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 95d69c2102f6..b2cb75513336 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ static bool housekeeping_dereference_check(enum hk_type type)
 
 static inline struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask_dereference(enum hk_type type)
 {
-	return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
-				     housekeeping_dereference_check(type));
+	return rcu_dereference_all_check(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
+					 housekeeping_dereference_check(type));
 }
 
 const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-13 20:31 [PATCH 00/33 v3] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 01/33] PCI: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 20:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-31 15:30     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 02/33] cpu: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug" Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 03/33] memcg: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 04/33] mm: vmstat: " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 05/33] sched/isolation: Save boot defined domain flags Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-23 15:45   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-10-31 15:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 06/33] cpuset: Convert boot_hk_cpus to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 07/33] driver core: cpu: Convert /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 08/33] net: Keep ignoring isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 09/33] block: Protect against concurrent " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 10/33] cpu: Provide lockdep check for CPU hotplug lock write-held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 11/33] cpuset: Provide lockdep check for cpuset lock held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 13:29   ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-31 16:08     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-03  2:32       ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 12/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21  1:46   ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21  1:57     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21  4:03     ` Waiman Long
2025-10-31 16:17       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-31 19:29         ` Waiman Long
2025-11-03  2:22         ` Chen Ridong
2025-11-05 15:18           ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2025-10-21  3:49   ` Waiman Long
2025-11-05 15:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 13/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21  4:10   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-22  1:36     ` Chen Ridong
2025-11-05 15:42     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-05 19:33       ` Waiman Long
2025-10-21 13:39   ` Waiman Long
2025-11-05 15:45     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-05 19:39       ` Waiman Long
2025-10-31 12:59   ` Phil Auld
2025-11-05 15:57     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 14/33] sched/isolation: Flush memcg workqueues on cpuset isolated partition change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 19:16   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-21 19:28     ` Waiman Long
2025-11-05 16:20       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-05 16:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 15/33] sched/isolation: Flush vmstat " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 16/33] PCI: Flush PCI probe workqueue " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 20:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-05 16:28     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 17/33] cpuset: Propagate cpuset isolation update to workqueue through housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 18/33] cpuset: Remove cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-29 18:05   ` Waiman Long
2025-11-05 16:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 19/33] sched/isolation: Remove HK_TYPE_TICK test from cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 20/33] PCI: Remove superfluous HK_TYPE_WQ check Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 21/33] kthread: Refine naming of affinity related fields Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 22/33] kthread: Include unbound kthreads in the managed affinity list Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 22:42   ` Waiman Long
2025-11-05 16:57     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 23/33] kthread: Include kthreadd to " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 24/33] kthread: Rely on HK_TYPE_DOMAIN for preferred affinity management Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 25/33] sched: Switch the fallback task allowed cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 26/33] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 27/33] sched/arm64: Move fallback task cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 28/33] kthread: Honour kthreads preferred affinity after cpuset changes Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 29/33] kthread: Comment on the purpose and placement of kthread_affine_node() call Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 30/33] kthread: Add API to update preferred affinity on kthread runtime Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 12:35   ` Simon Horman
2025-11-05 17:26     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 31/33] kthread: Document kthread_affine_preferred() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 32/33] genirq: Correctly handle preferred kthreads affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 33/33] doc: Add housekeeping documentation Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQtqrYlvMsjX91Vn@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).