public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: chuang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:34:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQtubP3V6tUOaEl5@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL9e9TZoOZ8KG66ea37bo=WztPqRPk8A9i0Ntx2KidYBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 06:26:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 7:09 PM chuang <nashuiliang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From 35dbc9abd8da820007391b707bd2c1a9c99ee67d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 02:52:11 +0000
> > Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding
> >  stale fnhe
> >
> > A race condition exists between fnhe_remove_oldest() and
> > rt_bind_exception() where a fnhe that is scheduled for removal can be
> > rebound to a new dst.
> >
> > The issue occurs when fnhe_remove_oldest() selects an fnhe (fnheX)
> > for deletion, but before it can be flushed and freed via RCU,
> > CPU 0 enters rt_bind_exception() and attempts to reuse the entry.
> >
> > CPU 0                             CPU 1
> > __mkroute_output()
> >   find_exception() [fnheX]
> >                                   update_or_create_fnhe()
> >                                     fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX]
> >   rt_bind_exception() [bind dst]
> >                                   RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak]
> >
> > If rt_bind_exception() successfully binds fnheX to a new dst, the
> > newly bound dst will never be properly freed because fnheX will
> > soon be released by the RCU callback, leading to a permanent
> > reference count leak on the old dst and the device.
> >
> > This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a
> > warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device:
> >
> >   unregister_netdevice: waiting for ethX to become free. Usage count = N
> >
> > Fix this race by clearing 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling
> > fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field,
> > setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and
> > bound to a new dst just before it is freed.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 67d6d681e15b ("ipv4: make exception cache less predictible")
> 
> I do not see how this commit added the bug you are looking at ?

Not the author, but my understanding is that the issue is that an
exception entry which is queued for deletion allows a dst entry to be
bound to it. As such, nobody will ever release the reference from the
dst entry and the associated net device.

Before 67d6d681e15b, exception entries were only queued for deletion by
ip_del_fnhe() and it prevented dst entries from binding themselves to
the deleted exception entry by clearing 'fnhe->fnhe_daddr' which is
checked in rt_bind_exception(). See ee60ad219f5c7.

67d6d681e15b added another point in the code that queues exception
entries for deletion, but without clearing 'fnhe->fnhe_daddr' first.
Therefore, it added another instance of the bug that was fixed in
ee60ad219f5c7.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/route.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> > index 6d27d3610c1c..b549d6a57307 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> > @@ -607,6 +607,11 @@ static void fnhe_remove_oldest(struct
> > fnhe_hash_bucket *hash)
> >                         oldest_p = fnhe_p;
> >                 }
> >         }
> > +
> > +       /* Clear oldest->fnhe_daddr to prevent this fnhe from being
> > +        * rebound with new dsts in rt_bind_exception().
> > +        */
> > +       oldest->fnhe_daddr = 0;
> >         fnhe_flush_routes(oldest);
> >         *oldest_p = oldest->fnhe_next;
> >         kfree_rcu(oldest, rcu);
> > --
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-04  3:09 [PATCH net] ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe chuang
2025-11-05 14:21 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-11-05 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-11-05 15:34   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2025-11-05 15:50     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-11-06  0:31     ` chuang
2025-11-07  9:53       ` chuang
2025-11-09 15:48         ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQtubP3V6tUOaEl5@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nashuiliang@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox