From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 07/11] selftests/vsock: add check_result() for pass/fail counting
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:52:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRMjeZVqsnc1BNr-@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v3-7-519372e8a07b@meta.com>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:49:51PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
>
> Add check_result() function to reuse logic for incrementing the
> pass/fail counters. This function will get used by different callers as
> we add different types of tests in future patches (namely, namespace and
> non-namespace tests will be called at different places, and re-use this
> function).
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - increment cnt_total directly (no intermediary var) (Stefano)
> - pass arg to check_result() from caller, dont incidentally rely on
> global (Stefano)
> - use new create_pidfile() introduce in v3 of earlier patch
> - continue with more disciplined variable quoting style
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
> index 557f9a99a306..05cf370a3db4 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ readonly TEST_DESCS=(
> "Run vsock_test using the loopback transport in the VM."
> )
>
> +readonly USE_SHARED_VM=(vm_server_host_client vm_client_host_server vm_loopback)
> +
> VERBOSE=0
>
> usage() {
> @@ -79,6 +81,28 @@ die() {
> exit "${KSFT_FAIL}"
> }
>
> +check_result() {
> + local rc arg
> +
> + rc=$1
> + arg=$2
> +
> + cnt_total=$(( cnt_total + 1 ))
> +
> + if [[ ${rc} -eq $KSFT_PASS ]]; then
> + cnt_pass=$(( cnt_pass + 1 ))
> + echo "ok ${num} ${arg}"
> + elif [[ ${rc} -eq $KSFT_SKIP ]]; then
> + cnt_skip=$(( cnt_skip + 1 ))
> + echo "ok ${num} ${arg} # SKIP"
> + elif [[ ${rc} -eq $KSFT_FAIL ]]; then
> + cnt_fail=$(( cnt_fail + 1 ))
> + echo "not ok ${num} ${arg} # exit=$rc"
Hi Bobby,
Should num be cnt_total above?
> + fi
> +
> + cnt_total=$(( cnt_total + 1 ))
It seems that cnt_total is being incremented twice.
Once seems like it ought to be enough.
> +}
> +
> vm_ssh() {
> ssh -q -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p ${SSH_HOST_PORT} localhost "$@"
> return $?
I'll confess that I didn't notice these myself, but
Claude Code with https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/ did.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 0:49 [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests/vsock: refactor and improve vmtest infrastructure Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/11] selftests/vsock: improve logging in vmtest.sh Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/11] selftests/vsock: make wait_for_listener() work even if pipefail is on Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] selftests/vsock: reuse logic for vsock_test through wrapper functions Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] selftests/vsock: avoid multi-VM pidfile collisions with QEMU Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 15:08 ` Simon Horman
2025-11-07 15:35 ` Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/11] selftests/vsock: do not unconditionally die if qemu fails Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/11] selftests/vsock: speed up tests by reducing the QEMU pidfile timeout Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/11] selftests/vsock: add check_result() for pass/fail counting Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-11 11:52 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-11-11 21:01 ` Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/11] selftests/vsock: add BUILD=0 definition Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/11] selftests/vsock: add 1.37 to tested virtme-ng versions Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/11] selftests/vsock: add vsock_loopback module loading Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] selftests/vsock: disable shellcheck SC2317 and SC2119 Bobby Eshleman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRMjeZVqsnc1BNr-@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).