From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2E130E0FA; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763730289; cv=none; b=ub1zUNYfpLTaqKzGReu34ev/m4sw8wTJRZAoaKCsdWgh7t04ntf/D4RFH5qRjqI8umG/Qp3O1DaVGEHZ8WEXQ71X/IVqbqb2x0CUwAZ3VXFbiYzxRq4OU3dBx+MW8bVRkgHSB41yTVW6zi1u/pTnFY0eyCi59XTDGcLVr3NxdYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763730289; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OHJBWC9nP8wgrfg2EA5xm625lTDtIVXg3O1V6xI/YMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XyYhU5klK7wRTFP5AOnqCQYOIt0X2YcLCeR+WnOXBwAY259NXAIiqSrKanLcg5WtyiDbv5ajEK5tt4WD2wJ6rWB05bt95YjpxKsiSCaTLSJ1fikd83f/8w3ljKuPPX4ani2N+8Fqtefaj+iAjSoy1FDralL5ZIATV4PUG5xg4GQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IPrvmWMJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IPrvmWMJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59116C4CEF1; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:04:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763730289; bh=OHJBWC9nP8wgrfg2EA5xm625lTDtIVXg3O1V6xI/YMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IPrvmWMJjPpAPh8xfxFS+5CRnJ2ErQihhPiOKWgayV9yAt1ILW2a3QDOLMAY+MxOw nPHDmT7JvVG71uxs4zSSgOm3S93F8sRocgJnxhOxK/jsrrHV49I38e8yEMyxokG2bw 2TIZAV+e8mWoiXmuq0xLDKiKE7etqA6/vRYaU0+acQPxOTXQKaO9m9prS2qcY4dciN k4G1WweE9J/oj2oclcLXe1XVZe66DDpEOt5P68T03QGd7BYoLqlVV1ucKKhvOceeBw AU3gYMQTg09tb5HClqp1dT5JNVxYoLxE/uzZHo1QwR7pDyDFIDtt5oiXnslYVkT2II jusdOtANrHV/Q== Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:04:46 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Randy Dunlap Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath: wil6210: fix a bunch of kernel-doc warnings Message-ID: References: <20251117020213.443126-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251117020213.443126-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 06:02:13PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > scripts/kernel-doc.py reports 51 kernel-doc warnings in wil6210.h. > Fix all kernel-doc warnings reported in wil6210.h. > > Several comments are changed from "/**" to "/*" since it appears that > "/**" was used for many non-kernel-doc comments. > > - add kernel-doc for missing function parameters > - add one function "Returns:" > - correct kernel-doc struct name to match actual struct name in 2 places > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap ... > @@ -444,8 +444,7 @@ static inline u8 mk_cidxtid(u8 cid, u8 t > * parse_cidxtid - parse @cidxtid field > * @cid: store CID value here > * @tid: store TID value here > - * > - * @cidxtid field encoded as bits 0..3 - CID; 4..7 - TID > + * @cidxtid: field encoded as bits 0..3 - CID; 4..7 - TID Hi Randy, I wonder if it would make sense to move the @cidxtid line so it is above the @cid line. In which case the order of the documentation of the parameters would match their order in the subject. But either way, this patch looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > */ > static inline void parse_cidxtid(u8 cidxtid, u8 *cid, u8 *tid) > { ...