From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/6] ice: shorten ring stat names and add accessors
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:17:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSWCQQsd-_cIKucF@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120-jk-refactor-queue-stats-v4-5-6e8b0cea75cc@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 12:20:45PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> The ice Tx/Rx hotpath has a few statistics counters for tracking unexpected
> events. These values are stored as u64 but are not accumulated using the
> u64_stats API. This could result in load/tear stores on some architectures.
> Even some 64-bit architectures could have issues since the fields are not
> read or written using ACCESS_ONCE or READ_ONCE.
>
> A following change is going to refactor the stats accumulator code to use
> the u64_stats API for all of these stats, and to use u64_stats_read and
> u64_stats_inc properly to prevent load/store tears on all architectures.
>
> Using u64_stats_inc and the syncp pointer is slightly verbose and would be
> duplicated in a number of places in the Tx and Rx hot path. Add accessor
> macros for the cases where only a single stat value is touched at once. To
> keep lines short, also shorten the stats names and convert ice_txq_stats
> and ice_rxq_stats to struct_group.
>
> This will ease the transition to properly using the u64_stats API in the
> following change.
>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
I had to read this and the next patch a few times to understand what was
going on. In the end, the key for me understanding this patch is "...
accessor macros for the cases where only a single stat value is touched at
once.". Especially the "once" bit.
In the context of the following patch I think this change makes sense.
And I appreciate that keeping lines short also makes sense. So no
objections to the direction you've taken here. But I might not have
thought to use struct_group for this myself.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 20:20 [PATCH iwl-next v4 0/6] ice: properly use u64_stats API for all ring stats Jacob Keller
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 1/6] ice: initialize ring_stats->syncp Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:15 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:23 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-04 12:13 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-18 10:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 2/6] ice: pass pointer to ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:16 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:12 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-18 10:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 3/6] ice: remove ice_q_stats struct and use struct_group Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:16 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:14 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-18 10:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 4/6] ice: use u64_stats API to access pkts/bytes in dim sample Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-18 10:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/6] ice: shorten ring stat names and add accessors Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-12-03 22:17 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-18 10:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2025-11-20 20:20 ` [PATCH iwl-next v4 6/6] ice: convert all ring stats to u64_stats_t Jacob Keller
2025-11-25 10:17 ` Simon Horman
2025-12-03 22:21 ` Jacob Keller
2025-12-18 10:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSWCQQsd-_cIKucF@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).