From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Jon Kohler <jon@nutanix.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] flow_dissector: save computed hash in __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net()
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:35:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS_2bPm-ZC9ghGPD@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B4079F8E-E823-4848-A3CE-81D319B1FC4F@nutanix.com>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 04:53:43PM +0000, Jon Kohler wrote:
> I thought about that, but the nice bit about doing it like I have it
> is that the flow keys / L4 hash bits are getting evaluated properly.
>
> If we do it like you’ve suggested, we’re asserting that L4 hash is always
> true, right?
Yes, for some reason I thought that the flow dissector always sets it in
this case.
> How about another helper, that only tun consumes, which does all of these
> things, such that the code still stays clean on the flow dissector side
> and we don’t have to mess with any other callers?
>
> That would be the middle ground between what you suggested and what I did
>
> Thoughts?
Not sure. We already have __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net() and
__skb_get_hash_symmetric() and now we will have a third variant. In this
case, maybe adding a 'save_hash' argument is better. It also means that
the next time someone needs to calculate a symmetric hash they will
pause to think if it needs to be set in the skb. I believe that when
skb_get_hash() was replaced with __skb_get_hash_symmetric() in tun the
assumption was that the hash will be stored in the skb as with
skb_get_hash().
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 18:19 [PATCH net-next] flow_dissector: save computed hash in __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net() Jon Kohler
2025-11-26 7:45 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-11-26 16:21 ` Jon Kohler
2025-11-27 8:24 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-12-02 16:53 ` Jon Kohler
2025-12-03 8:35 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aS_2bPm-ZC9ghGPD@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).