From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>,
"Benny (Ying-Tsan) Weng" <yweng@maxlinear.com>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: manually clear RANEG bit
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:06:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTMtI5VseldRIUnF@makrotopia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTL_0ZHa3vggLz6z@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 03:52:49PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 03:40:35PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 03:17:37PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 01:56:39PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 02:45:35PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 01:32:20AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > > > > Despite being documented as self-clearing, the RANEG bit sometimes
> > > > > > remains set, preventing auto-negotiation from happening.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Manually clear the RANEG bit after 10ms as advised by MaxLinear, using
> > > > > > delayed_work emulating the asynchronous self-clearing behavior.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe add some text why the complexity of delayed work is used, rather
> > > > > than just a msleep(10)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Calling regmap_read_poll_timeout() to see if it clears itself could
> > > > > optimise this, and still be simpler.
> > > >
> > > > Is the restart_an() operation allowed to sleep? Looking at other
> > > > drivers I only ever see that it sets a self-clearing AN RESTART bit,
> > > > never waiting for that bit to clear. Hence I wanted to immitate
> > > > that behavior by clearing the bit asynchronously. If that's not needed
> > > > and msleep(10) or usleep_range(10000, 20000) can be used instead that'd
> > > > be much easier, of course.
> > >
> > > Sleeping is permitted in this code path, but bear in mind that it
> > > will be called from ethtool ops, and thus the RTNL will be held,
> > > please keep sleep durations to a minimum.
> >
> > In that sense 10ms (on top of the MDIO operation) is not that little.
> > Maybe it is worth to use delayed_work to clear the bit after all...
>
> ... in which case I think you need to do a better job.
>
> The cancel_delayed_work() in the pcs_disable() method means if we
> stopp using this PCS briefly while the AN restart bit is set, there's
> nothing that will clear it.
The reset of the whole PCS unit (which is asserted in .pcs_disable and
deasserted in .pcs_enable) also resets the AN restart bit.
>
> There are other implementations that have this problem. mvneta has
> the same problem, but there we can write the register to set the
> MVNETA_GMAC_INBAND_RESTART_AN, and then immediately write it again
> without delay to clear this bit. The bit is documented as self
> clearing, but practical observation indicates it never does.
>
> Are you sure you need to wait 10ms ? What happens if you set the
> bit and then immediately clear it, like we do for mvneta?
MaxLinear engineer Benny Weng has told me (quote):
"I did a check on the REANEG bit, [...] and it needs to clear the bit
manually and please give 10ms delay in between."
In my observation the bit *does* clear itself *most* of the time,
but aparently when being set in the wrong moment it doesn't. This
makes testing rather difficult and I'd just follow their advise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-05 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 1:32 [PATCH net] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: manually clear RANEG bit Daniel Golle
2025-12-05 13:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-12-05 13:56 ` Daniel Golle
2025-12-05 14:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-12-05 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-12-05 15:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-12-05 15:40 ` Daniel Golle
2025-12-05 15:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-12-05 19:06 ` Daniel Golle [this message]
2025-12-05 15:58 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTMtI5VseldRIUnF@makrotopia.org \
--to=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi@prevas.dk \
--cc=yweng@maxlinear.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).