From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F241D27F171; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 19:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765308257; cv=none; b=av81nDqoekyqDhgfI81Eho6aC4HHhRijx6YtyH6tqfx0QWbnAmIDMGgUBHTGMqeZqZSrzJQDinpXRlmCsiO3AVZax1I3v3bxg3MXSEjoBxKEkjO5OU8HXTqLIlpXG4ZW8utuAuSPKt2rH+JwGZIib0ll7f69Uze9FHNmQf0GlbQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765308257; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E05UfQyxpQn6Tfx1hYQtaiY2PLO6y2FnyY5lmQUU0mw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hHAOOe0H7py02SE1piGE4m8P1ZaBij01baZmqoQuVlkv5ukm7Cdq2zVqrS5f8emkUcvWUWf/cRfS+iW2y/MdHoIddSrB2d7W6o1r3Ybp+WDUopxaaH5bNG04B837TooSGkPuOSQrQWXGmx1Gxn1hogzOKORwTZ0TZdWZKrGPr6Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=haadYiIo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="haadYiIo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2427DC4CEF5; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 19:24:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765308256; bh=E05UfQyxpQn6Tfx1hYQtaiY2PLO6y2FnyY5lmQUU0mw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=haadYiIop9xxgas8tvMFq6Sb4GXFkAVik8x8erECfEZlNQSEunCozojrREpwIC5aK vkOzo5ZMiHCWUrl8SyStaYgsqEkK8whlezSsRU10OiSdEu8ecaLAfZJ/9yOUuT9mfS NPxWDShkyjosusxh6+c3g+CwhZ+V8z4ttyk+rt/SRyv95J2Qvy7NikQMM9RHRLU3lt BMeMogwIUOsslzGNFhOTxO3QpKon6wsp0u/kjdnbvp7aYZ6tPpovIKc4B46g3t2SEL W9FOUTDt9FfE07JgKhz6oGI30/pGbLAbL8uF9Jvg2NA+I1bJZqksGZwCz521Z6uVSE W7WQ5raUxN8Tg== Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 19:24:11 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Eric Biggers , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Francesco Ruggeri , Salam Noureddine , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/tcp_sigpool: Enable compile-testing Message-ID: References: <95d8884780f3682637f0e93049cc484545464ef9.1764860099.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <95d8884780f3682637f0e93049cc484545464ef9.1764860099.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Since commit 37a183d3b7cdb873 ("tcp: Convert tcp-md5 to use MD5 library > instead of crypto_ahash"), TCP_SIGPOOL is only selected by TCP_AO. > However, the latter depends on 64BIT, so tcp_sigpool can no longer be > built on 32-bit platforms at all. > > Improve compile coverage on 32-bit by allowing the user to enable > TCP_SIGPOOL when compile-testing. Add a dependency on CRYPTO, which is > always fulfilled when selected by TCP_AO. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > One remaining oddity is that TCP_SIGPOOL has always been a tristate > symbol, while all users that select it have always been boolean symbols. > I kept that as-is, as it builds fine as a module. Hi Geert, I tested some of the COMPILE_TEST/TCP_AO combinations and this seems to work as expected. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman However, ## Form letter - net-next-closed The merge window for v6.19 has begun and therefore net-next has closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only. Please repost when net-next reopens. Due to a combination of the merge-window, travel commitments of the maintainers, and the holiday season, net-next will re-open after 2nd January. RFC patches sent for review only are welcome at any time. See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle -- pw-bot: defer