From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Alice C. Munduruca" <alice.munduruca@canonical.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: fix "buffer overflow detected" for tap.c
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:13:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTqZUSZaZjDTlejt@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210223932.957446-1-alice.munduruca@canonical.com>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:39:32PM -0500, Alice C. Munduruca wrote:
> When 'tap.c' is compiled with '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3', the strcpy() in
> rtattr_add_strsz() is replaced with a checked version which causes the
> test to consistently fail when compiled with toolchains for which this
> option is enabled by default.
>
> TAP version 13
> 1..3
> # Starting 3 tests from 1 test cases.
> # RUN tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_valid_udp_gso: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso
> not ok 1 tap.test_packet_valid_udp_gso
> # RUN tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_valid_udp_csum: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum
> not ok 2 tap.test_packet_valid_udp_csum
> # RUN tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto ...
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> # test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto: Test terminated by assertion
> # FAIL tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto
> not ok 3 tap.test_packet_crash_tap_invalid_eth_proto
> # FAILED: 0 / 3 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:0 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Using `memcpy`, an unchecked function, avoids this issue and allows
> the tests to go forwards as expected.
>
> Fixes: 2e64fe4624d1 ("selftests: add few test cases for tap driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alice C. Munduruca <alice.munduruca@canonical.com>
Thanks Alice,
I agree that this approach makes sense.
But I wonder if the commit message should also mention:
1. That this is consistent with usage elsewhere in this file
2. Why there is actually no overflow.
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 22:39 [PATCH net] selftests: net: fix "buffer overflow detected" for tap.c Alice C. Munduruca
2025-12-11 10:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTqZUSZaZjDTlejt@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alice.munduruca@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).