From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D476495E5; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765883877; cv=none; b=WYmOG2m/KmCj3YxCxuYZcL161dHDZYYz+TglPB50rKQuFs0A5dWsNksHkzbhgHPP13Tbv5VEr0k/6B5R9EOI9oJnqJNHDeaAyUgh64YXRgI6ZrcwPhsZGno8UQFI59/B9WRyeo53yWwGQAED5bd8Sqd6ag5iNDFhf+gvRp2Fw4c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765883877; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BEuyTtqDMx5h6ORSf5bINsSWI5dnWXm/xlwkK4G19o4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OcSirAduAthsOBbC7ehRtWCQZ6l5iHfEroVx6nBD3TVtpJVHYeGA3BT6tOHZwiFq5i658y/zeD6F3xmtYdRYnI6Z5fGpBH+TYfKOjuoRfQunaf1C9eH9GCFxuAaCH/Wgfo7nB1+oyy5f7kdrGJ8V03oE5Gr4+hUabnWd3qBUUF4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iUgP+C3T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iUgP+C3T" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5598FC4CEF1; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:17:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765883877; bh=BEuyTtqDMx5h6ORSf5bINsSWI5dnWXm/xlwkK4G19o4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iUgP+C3TQCnh0T0x7P6XIawOktkqlkoFmYWHg2zPYbezHdiEX66U/xMxZ5u+cYdgY wD12921OTJMHrtObMspiLFnmRFIxNX+HDrrPbgmTSTpyQYScmaS6nQrypaL6ko1eU4 vgCdQ4qJxpgJzXlx6qiKoxCUO14TaVJJzSMj8MGd0JvAwjWGeDGxSrJ0AZDJvY35cb MnPbmFydEGSRM6GTUZUCG2NmOfWKm50Iyx1sUxbjuM4w4A93wBn0sCreaEAhp/mY6g uB5TiyOeYoABu8U4LDJAcfccXhDs6LZilKo1hIajaI9KDSt3zWG+c977C+7MEJnYiQ UTh9WxbID3ZbQ== Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:17:52 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Dmitry Skorodumov Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Liang , Jakub Kicinski , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Guillaume Nault , Julian Vetter , Eric Dumazet , Stanislav Fomichev , Etienne Champetier , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Message-ID: References: <20251215165457.752634-1-skorodumov.dmitry@huawei.com> <4a0b0695-f13e-4611-a6a5-524b4967ff6e@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a0b0695-f13e-4611-a6a5-524b4967ff6e@huawei.com> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 08:00:52PM +0300, Dmitry Skorodumov wrote: > I'm working currently on some selftests/net for ipvtap for some kind of test (test calls "ip a a/ip a d" in several threads), but I'm unsure how to proceed: > > This patch is supposed to be a "fix". But selftest - obviously not a fix. > > So, I'm unsure how to send a selftest for this. Hi Dmitry, I think that in cases like this - a fix coupled with a selftest for the fixed problem - both the fix and the selftest can be included in a patch-set targeted at net.