From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
devel@linux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/6] xfrm: remove redundent assignment
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:59:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWZd6TZwmT_Gtgbv@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <393387273f8a903a6205f1faeb020ce92ddd61b9.1767964254.git.antony@moon.secunet.de>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 02:37:08PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> this assignmet is overwritten within the same function further down
nit: This assignment...
Also, redundant is misspelt in the subject.
>
> 80c9abaabf42 ("[XFRM]: Extension for dynamic update of endpoint address(es)")
>
> x->props.family = m->new_family;
>
> e03c3bba351f ("xfrm: Fix xfrm migrate issues when address family changes")
And your Signed-off-by line is missing.
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 13:29 [PATCH ipsec-next 0/6] xfrm: XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE new netlink message Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 1/6] xfrm: remove redundent assignment Antony Antony
2026-01-13 14:59 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 2/6] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 3/6] xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 4/6] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration Antony Antony
2026-01-13 14:57 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-14 16:09 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-01-15 13:44 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-16 11:02 ` Antony Antony
2026-01-16 11:26 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 5/6] xfrm: reqid is invarient in old migration Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 6/6] xfrm: check that SA is in VALID state before use Antony Antony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWZd6TZwmT_Gtgbv@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox