public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@gmail.com>, Xinfa Deng <xinfa.deng@gl-inet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: dsa: lantiq: allow arbitrary MII registers
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 01:40:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWhFohyjEnaIeHSS@makrotopia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572c7d91f8eb97bd72584018f9b5941dbfb2e46e.1768438019.git.daniel@makrotopia.org>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 12:57:07AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> The Lantiq GSWIP and MaxLinear GSW1xx drivers are currently relying on a
> hard-coded mapping of MII ports to their respective MII_CFG and MII_PCDU
> registers and only allow applying an offset to the port index.
> 
> While this is sufficient for the currently supported hardware, the very
> similar Intel GSW150 (aka. Lantiq PEB7084) cannot be described using
> this arrangement.
> 
> Introduce two arrays to specify the MII_CFG and MII_PCDU registers for
> each port, replacing the current bitmap used to safeguard MII ports as
> well as the port index offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> ---
> v2:
>  * introduce GSWIP_MAX_PORTS macro
> 
>  drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c        | 30 ++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.h        |  6 ++--
>  drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip_common.c | 27 +++---------------
>  drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/mxl-gsw1xx.c          | 30 ++++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> index b094001a7c805..4a1be6a1df6fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> @@ -463,10 +463,20 @@ static void gswip_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct gswip_hw_info gswip_xrx200 = {
> -	.max_ports = 7,
> +	.max_ports = GSWIP_MAX_PORTS,
>  	.allowed_cpu_ports = BIT(6),
> -	.mii_ports = BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(5),
> -	.mii_port_reg_offset = 0,
> +	.mii_cfg = {
> +		[0 ... GSWIP_MAX_PORTS - 1] = -1,
> +		[0] = GSWIP_MII_CFGp(0),
> +		[1] = GSWIP_MII_CFGp(1),
> +		[5] = GSWIP_MII_CFGp(5),
> +	},

Kernel CI trips with
warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]

Would it be ok to enclose the gswip_hw_info initializers with
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore_all("-Woverride-init",
		  "logic to initialize all and then override some is OK");

like it is done in drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c?

Or should I rather keep the .mii_ports bitmap in addition to the array
to indicate the indexes with valid values?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-15  0:56 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: dsa: lantiq: add support for Intel GSW150 Daniel Golle
2026-01-15  0:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] dt-bindings: net: dsa: lantiq,gswip: use correct node name Daniel Golle
2026-01-15 19:59   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-15  0:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] dt-bindings: net: dsa: lantiq,gswip: add Intel GSW150 Daniel Golle
2026-01-15 20:00   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-15  0:57 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: dsa: lantiq: allow arbitrary MII registers Daniel Golle
2026-01-15  1:40   ` Daniel Golle [this message]
2026-01-15 10:06     ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-01-15  0:57 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: dsa: lantiq: clean up phylink_get_caps switch statement Daniel Golle
2026-01-15  0:57 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: only setup SerDes PCS if it exists Daniel Golle
2026-01-15  0:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: add support for Intel GSW150 Daniel Golle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWhFohyjEnaIeHSS@makrotopia.org \
    --to=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ptpt52@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=xinfa.deng@gl-inet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox