From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
Cc: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
devel@linux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 4/6] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:26:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWogXn5hUay3iTd_@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWoatI4v84lJAC48@Antony2201.local>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:02:12PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 01:44:50PM +0000, Simon Horman via Devel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> >
> > Hi Antony,
> >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 02:57:16PM +0000, Simon Horman via Devel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 02:38:05PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > +static int xfrm_send_migrate_state(const struct xfrm_user_migrate_state *um,
> > > > > + const struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap,
> > > > > + const struct xfrm_user_offload *xuo)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + int err;
> > > > > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > > > > + struct net *net = &init_net;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_migrate_state_msgsize(!!encap, !!xuo), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > > + if (!skb)
> > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + err = build_migrate_state(skb, um, encap, xuo);
> > > > > + if (err < 0) {
> > > > > + WARN_ON(1);
>
> kfree_skb(skb); replace the above line; explained bellow
>
> > > > > + return err;
> > > >
> > > > skb seems to be leaked here.
> > > >
> > > > Also flagged by Review Prompts.
> > >
> > > I don't see a skb leak. It also looks similar to the functions above.
> >
> > xfrm_get_ae() is the previous caller of nlmsg_new() in this file.
> > It calls BUG_ON() on error, so leaking is not an issue there.
> >
> > The caller before that is xfrm_get_default() which calls kfree_skb() in
> > it's error path. Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I was thinking
> > that approach is appropriate here too.
>
> You’re right. There is a leak in the error path.
>
> The new helper I added is similar to build_migrate(), but that code uses
> BUG_ON() on the error path. That feels too extreme here (even though there
> are other instances of it in the same file).
FWIIW, the use of BUG_ON in xfrm_get_ae() did give me pause for thought.
>
> I’ll follow the pattern in xfrm_get_default(): handle the error by freeing
> the skb (kfree_skb()) and returning an error. And no WARN_ON().
>
> I’ll send v3 shortly.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 13:29 [PATCH ipsec-next 0/6] xfrm: XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE new netlink message Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 1/6] xfrm: remove redundent assignment Antony Antony
2026-01-13 14:59 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 2/6] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:37 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 3/6] xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 4/6] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration Antony Antony
2026-01-13 14:57 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-14 16:09 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-01-15 13:44 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-16 11:02 ` Antony Antony
2026-01-16 11:26 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 5/6] xfrm: reqid is invarient in old migration Antony Antony
2026-01-09 13:38 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 6/6] xfrm: check that SA is in VALID state before use Antony Antony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWogXn5hUay3iTd_@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=antony@phenome.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox