From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [78.32.30.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C4EC8F0 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769475557; cv=none; b=sBIlsyb9EUbKJpV6FQIJP0L8WYzqNSvlxnFRLKW/hVYrXItTlnBxaAFaHKpm14NMGHCEWYu444hEmZY8KOYN5PhXHROEB9M57oH8/5hNlwFIzGEtDzJowXWap1DW+eKP68QF5Pqnx8fX+GPy05Fd90f86e9WxfYKSBDGpdZIbA4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769475557; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AtsAxCM/4ncC3th6u5NjDYLwN8cEPCQ9X120I4IC64c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mRjYR+lMBRr/cIhgU5DYwZkhI2C+Kbhk7eGlcqTWoYi4V7t5AWKvoT8fXJypLKGTsUiym5HMnEOoPeczX+JTefgBuWAvu+EICFxG7U+ViBCLZVUP9QnduudEaBu3FuqYkaJVEJfyLhxRlzyj790p79Idre5adkBBRgmrX7pIBsg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b=XxqMU6so; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="XxqMU6so" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UB3pHoZfhLuR5wYLQxTQQtxInkU8rpiKFH8WiyB2FiA=; b=XxqMU6so9wgx0Ob7CLD9I9koKl 1bIuqOnsrKnirdPF6+IUlbbHkk5osLqE+abCrhyjGdoY7Gy6OHLWamp/T474HWewZmcVzLJd/868+ hI6TLQKi54zIrHiZqusoZ0OvfZVePQtUFScEwHaZa0/zufsVSpVPD30186q/4gQX8n1RfsPIAb2jI 20FG78TAy838yHXfa16Za4e33oHnnxyp46iJh6CXlAfC23YObXQNY0kPpsBvc7EXM9SFGoHALGkBl 1opeldmTzfqeWnkDCWXWaFbe51TKc1PskJvPH1WZJdmLWHQdu0BnhNlEH1kZ/XYTGG/RzJyAR3qvK F93ep63g==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:44558) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vkXQB-000000005UP-3uHt; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:59:08 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vkXQ9-000000005R5-2z48; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:59:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:59:05 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Heiko Stuebner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/22] net: stmmac: rk: add SoC specific ->init() method Message-ID: References: <20260126165144.25055591@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260126165144.25055591@kernel.org> Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 04:51:44PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:34:17 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:45:28AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > Add a SoC specific init method. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) > > > > I see the AI review has identified that this patch has an issue, whereas > > in the previous review, it was fine with this patch. I can't imagine what > > it's problem with this patch is > > I released the reviews for you, the first one looks legit, I haven't > scanned the rest so YMMV. > > > and there's no way to find out for about 9 hours (more like 19 hours > > for me because of the timezone) as the AI reviews are not accessible > > until then. > > The patchwork checks are for maintainers. If someone wants to build > a public CI for contributors that'd be great. We can even provide > funds from the netdev foundation. But let us be clear that the current > setup is until now maintained primarily by me for me on the weekends. > Unless you make an effort to actually help I don't think it is in good > taste to complain. This sounds like my contributions to netdev aren't valued, and if that's the case, I will stop. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!