From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [91.216.245.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097E01A267; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.216.245.30 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769518830; cv=none; b=nP7aStKlY6c22XsKd47zcHS47SDRg6fiw1ZfKwJ9NHIV2qUGlBlU5ZDSthSV7/yINKMGAgq9usSRXqklCE31V2rCfjMTrZGc5grLBQp+UxuEu1RrvzVJR8hc0wAN9ErufwAnyVpbwmueS+EqVUjrJZRMXcKN6Qis1nTAfU2vZzc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769518830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oLR+gZMbDd/CCv9Wa5C4E2lll9KuLUj11Zia3brqlHA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V+Q0zC7TjSXjIBxY8ZCHq9KiJOt/23b6Z8RIyQTwJ5bT/UWCXoNwz2JAbfUbcLtYHALNBuXKY1obgbl8y+pmdrrmjk4TBRpS2QWJu/4nlGk5HkAKYvi/j6lSiejDPVaSuIB894FQcR3qe8OQO9s15SrRBRRjmJjdrtp1s0WlHR8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=strlen.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=strlen.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.216.245.30 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=strlen.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=strlen.de Received: by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 23DA96033F; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:00:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:00:27 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: "Remy D. Farley" Cc: Donald Hunter , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] doc/netlink: nftables: Add getcompat operation Message-ID: References: <20260121184621.198537-1-one-d-wide@protonmail.com> <20260121184621.198537-6-one-d-wide@protonmail.com> <2mi8BfZGa57pxicf4pXNT_oDJ3bvV7pByJOBhG8e7u_3eBbjubS3YJ88xHp4oDiMi3iY20zcG6FgF8_m5nsJJ_3CYHNftjAL_4EAqN5zeU0=@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2mi8BfZGa57pxicf4pXNT_oDJ3bvV7pByJOBhG8e7u_3eBbjubS3YJ88xHp4oDiMi3iY20zcG6FgF8_m5nsJJ_3CYHNftjAL_4EAqN5zeU0=@protonmail.com> Remy D. Farley wrote: > > Its used by compatibility mode, it requires an nft binary linked > > to libxtables, native nftables doesn't need it. > > > > I would prefer not to mention its existence. > > Ah, I see. Netlink-bindings have a tool to decode netlink communication, so > it's a bit awkward to show a bunch of unkown-operations on a common command. > I'm fine keeping it downstream. No, showing unknown-operations is even worse. Maybe just document in commit message that this is to avoid clutter and present something more readable. And perhaps mention that this is only for iptables-nft in the yaml file too. (nft uses it on 'nft list' only if it encounters a rule added by iptables-nft).