From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A58D2E2846; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770802213; cv=none; b=GrzoGZyqp5likY6ttpaf31iZ0kHJapFD800D2reENsI5Nsf2NY8qM+3VUxwbXCRM49ZAJymd0wPKvtgKVFKHVdGj6dIO6Axa5yfx+RDsHy2rFPqPCrWYw74rXPdZGzEOSKRmvElhn/XsuLuWhkxxGSGVulXj5SAkC3ad7I8PeeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770802213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EqakioYghRNqkCQBAO5HuncnmYB7Lk+8kffgMpM3l/M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u6WoCj7KE6lXsh6zvhEk8uUoW0G+LK5pRvdHsFIaHecdERRkajQeEbZYapvqr1p4oQTUnpcrk8gm+dlscl3xZfEdAEuwDE2lMxsBZYkbnHkAYHj3yFLu4qN4hp5Cz0Ya/t8URU4LlA1gdYhEmPBFApNhHirMXxPysiT/m41sEdA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=nUe8gnPl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="nUe8gnPl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/p0l5jRRZK2EQAfLRLRqfh8VdcD5GwZDTrR8qMHZTVo=; b=nUe8gnPlDe0cRJqScxzvF7yE96 0h6s/ZbNlh5NaKG20kfA3ejNa+5bCi4M4P7wk/X4Q22I639APluyeTL2lhlfUdDzW1ckkhh1jeMwo l7RSgGbW4YC+4Q7iJ57ZCruwyDcgoMHXwCZ2h0eLA5gr89esgjcoz8g/C3mGhSjU6lI3NskDTefZI Bc+a2Y+V1Sc+jc7D+30IshwlhJPLJOhmtZVQd1iiW88BzqpGDcd+36dEu/xx+fUQdN2xvK/ttuIFu vllrmlwhgdMjhQXxUQxR0X8K/Ws6POcqtpfnf9U9Lkb1w16Qo8zpHqJVMBj+CeBeKKc/5SegxELiw VvFodD8g==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vq6Xp-00Aw2T-0w; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:30:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 01:29:54 -0800 From: Breno Leitao To: Andreas Hindborg Cc: Matthew Wood , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com, asantostc@gmail.com, calvin@wbinvd.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] configfs: enable kernel-space item registration Message-ID: References: <20251202-configfs_netcon-v1-0-b4738ead8ee8@debian.org> <878qfgx25r.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <-6hh70JX5nq4ruTMbNQPMoUi6wz8vmM2MQxqB3VNK3Zt97c-oxWOo3y0cQ7_h6BSfcp78fR9GmzxcTQb_WB-XA==@protonmail.internalid> <875xakwwvz.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87qzquuqsx.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <877bsjvhqv.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <877bsjvhqv.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> X-Debian-User: leitao On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 08:53:12AM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > Breno Leitao writes: > > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > >> Perhaps we should discuss this at a venue where we can get some more > >> people together? LPC or LSF maybe? > > > > Certainly, I agree. I’ve submitted my subscription to LSFMMBPF with the main > > goal to discuss this topic. I wasn’t planning to present it this, given it was > > a "overkill"?, but I’m happy to do so if that is the right direction. > > I'd appreciate if we can get some people in a room and force them to > think about this. I think it is a good idea if you submit a topic. If we > don't get a slot, we can see what we can do in the hallway, and if that > does not work out we are forced to make a decision between the 4 of us > participating on list. At least nobody can say we did not try to collect > input and opinions then. That is an excellent follow-up and direction, let me submit a topic in there. --breno