From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B89017BB21 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770823662; cv=none; b=W2xHLEKyP23gQLMyOsfIrryLteyM0QoN4eDBwyLt+mc93X8+oHy4G82yel5HsO845HfXn0o+/68yJhqBfmoJbDPceN1eSYdAn0wQmhCTcSI7tbtUjJEfPeMuwzuWIeUaeVnqXL0q2nfflqke6Jqc9pfcqb0v5hFMZ4NUwsfxPMI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770823662; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7nXvzHRcz9OdTY9UVPbwcgd+YPxqsXO/tP+VWTcmiBk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JFarRdhcHSztL92ArY0rB4HNlxUayYr9uagSTci8uus4ivzTKvoH1ykwsY482YXItewSftAT+6vQzMLRYluU80kMQM8V2UIhkli1Xth6SLfSQmmZf9/ogHMXZXQ0Hgs2WxzwppmCXAopuMr3e52QrOlmqQe+y7HkC0PS/MuElrw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=es7BJzkf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="es7BJzkf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Kvp+0Na0cRa1/qXJ/7KH6URM0xg+XZMbEtZZp11D+oI=; b=es7BJzkfI9iCd1ETIcDGnpjhQu u40R1m4GkjZa9UV8Xeaqvxxt/I5iatEEOeh54GSagcQ0mUvJggtOxpn3BiQogPqfYpARavWAGdw08 8q3cqJAdW93iX3PjXBxhLa90HCl4sB24FUJ5G31vH7kEY2Fx6jca4pX92lROS3V4xl8gtq+X9hzeY 1qeX5tdi+axtwP9k4X3xUN+k8lIyXCdDJUN2rBqSRbh8Vi5oJoO6M24ZdMJCf5ppJLTWXJ/7f02CI 2VXzJUlOxj99PE90TiemnDoTdjfxMtiDYhujygnyZknU99ZDfb9k0Fx5lOHYLsGIx8bPVX5hJObHf 67FApt5w==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vqC7p-00B7ux-Jn for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:27:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:27:30 -0800 From: Breno Leitao To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Skip NAPI polling when PCI channel is offline Message-ID: References: <20260209-mlx5_iommu-v1-1-b17ae501aeb2@debian.org> <09a77964-37bf-4b3c-bfa9-8939eb7761ab@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: leitao On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 07:17:34AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 05:44:56AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 01:26:35PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote: > > > On 09/02/2026 20:01, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > > If the problem is that the WARN_ON is being called at a high rate, then it > > > should be rate-limited. > > > > That would be a solution as well, and I am happy to pursue it, if that one is > > more appropriate > > In fact, I got more inclined to try to fix it in iommu code, let's see how it > goes. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260211-dma_io_mmu-v1-1-cf89e24437af@debian.org/ > > -- > pv-bot: closed -- pw-bot: closed