* [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning
@ 2026-02-23 14:31 Przemyslaw Korba
2026-02-24 8:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel
2026-02-25 9:59 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Przemyslaw Korba @ 2026-02-23 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Cc: netdev, anthony.l.nguyen, przemyslaw.kitszel, Przemyslaw Korba
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
index 73a4e28ed75f..f101fdb3e9cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
@@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ static int
ice_dpll_init_fwnode_pins(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_dpll_pin *pins,
int start_idx)
{
- char pin_name[8];
+ char pin_name[16];
int i, ret;
pf->dplls.wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("ice_dpll_wq");
base-commit: af960c69349a922fac3b4fbdb42e118a35c8700f
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning 2026-02-23 14:31 [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning Przemyslaw Korba @ 2026-02-24 8:57 ` Przemek Kitszel 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 2026-02-25 9:59 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Przemek Kitszel @ 2026-02-24 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Przemyslaw Korba; +Cc: netdev, anthony.l.nguyen, intel-wired-lan On 2/23/26 15:31, Przemyslaw Korba wrote: > ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’: > ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated > writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4 > [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), > "rclk%u", i); > > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") thank you for the fix this is a correct tag, and a correct target > Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > index 73a4e28ed75f..f101fdb3e9cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > @@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ static int > ice_dpll_init_fwnode_pins(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_dpll_pin *pins, > int start_idx) > { > - char pin_name[8]; > + char pin_name[16]; > int i, ret; > > pf->dplls.wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("ice_dpll_wq"); 3537│ for (i = 0; i < pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents; i++) { upper bound of the loop is u8 (ok), but we assign it as an int (good) 3538│ pins[start_idx + i].pf = pf; 3539│ snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), "rclk%u", i); compiler tries to be too smart here anyway, it's better to have that warning gone instead of waiting for a fix in the compiler Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning 2026-02-24 8:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel @ 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Korba, Przemyslaw @ 2026-03-02 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kitszel, Przemyslaw Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nguyen, Anthony L, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org > From: Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:57 AM > To: Korba, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning > > On 2/23/26 15:31, Przemyslaw Korba wrote: > > ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’: > > ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated > > writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4 > > [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), > > "rclk%u", i); > > > > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") > > thank you for the fix > this is a correct tag, and a correct target > > > Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > > index 73a4e28ed75f..f101fdb3e9cf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c > > @@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ static int > > ice_dpll_init_fwnode_pins(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_dpll_pin *pins, > > int start_idx) > > { > > - char pin_name[8]; > > + char pin_name[16]; > > int i, ret; > > > > pf->dplls.wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("ice_dpll_wq"); > > 3537│ for (i = 0; i < pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents; i++) { > > upper bound of the loop is u8 (ok), but we assign it as an int (good) > > 3538│ pins[start_idx + i].pf = pf; > 3539│ snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), "rclk%u", i); > > compiler tries to be too smart here > > > anyway, it's better to have that warning gone instead of waiting for > a fix in the compiler > > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> Thank you very much for the review 😊 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning 2026-02-23 14:31 [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning Przemyslaw Korba 2026-02-24 8:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel @ 2026-02-25 9:59 ` Simon Horman 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2026-02-25 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Przemyslaw Korba Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, anthony.l.nguyen, przemyslaw.kitszel On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote: > ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’: > ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated > writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4 > [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), > "rclk%u", i); > > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") > Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> Hi Przemyslaw, I agree that it is good to address this problem. But is it a bug? It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u. So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that. If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for citing commits): Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning 2026-02-25 9:59 ` Simon Horman @ 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 2026-03-02 14:04 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Korba, Przemyslaw @ 2026-03-02 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw > From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:00 AM > To: Korba, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote: > > ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’: > > ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated > > writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4 > > [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), > > "rclk%u", i); > > > > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") > > Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > > Hi Przemyslaw, > > I agree that it is good to address this problem. > But is it a bug? > > It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u. > So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that > pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that. > > If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have > a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem > something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for > citing commits): > > Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and > dynamic pin discovery") > Thank you! I sent it to next, with updated commit message 😊 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw @ 2026-03-02 14:04 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2026-03-02 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Korba, Przemyslaw Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 12:01:12PM +0000, Korba, Przemyslaw wrote: > > From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:00 AM > > To: Korba, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > > Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote: > > > ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’: > > > ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated > > > writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4 > > > [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), > > > "rclk%u", i); > > > > > > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery") > > > Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <przemyslaw.korba@intel.com> > > > > Hi Przemyslaw, > > > > I agree that it is good to address this problem. > > But is it a bug? > > > > It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u. > > So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that > > pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that. > > > > If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have > > a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem > > something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for > > citing commits): > > > > Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and > > dynamic pin discovery") > > > > Thank you! I sent it to next, with updated commit message 😊 Thanks, much appreciated. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-02 14:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-02-23 14:31 [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning Przemyslaw Korba 2026-02-24 8:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 2026-02-25 9:59 ` Simon Horman 2026-03-02 12:01 ` Korba, Przemyslaw 2026-03-02 14:04 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox