From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
syzbot+5a66db916cdde0dbcc1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: protect driver_block_list in flow_block_cb_setup_simple()
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 12:42:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZRUFQGKzEdcjNHG@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZHE4r18hkxdITD-@strlen.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1752 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 02:06:42PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 12:30:58 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > > Looking at the *upper layer*, I don't think it expected drivers to use
> > > > > a single global list for this bit something that is scoped to the
> > > > > net_device.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe subjective but the fix seems a little off to me.
> > > > Isn't flow_block_cb_setup_simple() just a "simple" implementation
> > > > for reuse in drivers locking in there doesn't really guarantee much?
> > >
> > > Not sure what you mean. I see the same pattern as netdevsim in all
> > > drivers using this API.
> >
> > Grep for flow_block_cb_add(). Not all drivers use
>
> static int
> mtk_eth_setup_tc_block(struct net_device *dev, struct flow_block_offload *f)
> {
> struct mtk_mac *mac = netdev_priv(dev);
> struct mtk_eth *eth = mac->hw;
> static LIST_HEAD(block_cb_list);
> ~~~~~~
> I have a question.
>
> [..]
> f->driver_block_list = &block_cb_list;
>
> Now I have many questions!
>
> How is this supposed to work?
Last time I met people, I asked how is hw offload actually working
with netns (6 years ago?), someone told me: "maybe there is a driver
that supports it...". I have never seen one, but I am very much
outdates on how this has evolved TBH, I might be wrong.
I don't think any driver really supports netns + hardware offload, so
I suggest to restrict it, see attached patch.
It would be better to add a helper function such as int net_setup_tc()
for the myriad of ->ndo_setup_tc() calls in the code, then move this
check in it to consolidate, but I think you want something you can
pass to -stable at this stage?
[-- Attachment #2: restrict-hw-offload-to-init_netns.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3332 bytes --]
diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
index 99ac747b7906..a97838c1c56d 100644
--- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
@@ -692,6 +692,9 @@ struct tc_cls_u32_offload {
static inline bool tc_can_offload(const struct net_device *dev)
{
+ if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), &init_net))
+ return false;
+
return dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TC;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
index b1966b68c48a..c6d426052765 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
@@ -1173,6 +1173,9 @@ static int nf_flow_table_offload_cmd(struct flow_block_offload *bo,
{
int err;
+ if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), &init_net))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
nf_flow_table_block_offload_init(bo, dev_net(dev), cmd, flowtable,
extack);
down_write(&flowtable->flow_block_lock);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
index fd30e205de84..048fa5f356d9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ bool nft_chain_offload_support(const struct nft_base_chain *basechain)
ops->hooknum != NF_NETDEV_INGRESS)
return false;
+ if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), &init_net))
+ return false;
+
dev = ops->dev;
if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc &&
!flow_indr_dev_exists())
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_cbs.c b/net/sched/sch_cbs.c
index 8c9a0400c862..6daa9f702a59 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_cbs.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_cbs.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int cbs_enable_offload(struct net_device *dev, struct cbs_sched_data *q,
struct tc_cbs_qopt_offload cbs = { };
int err;
- if (!ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+ if (!tc_can_offload(dev) || !ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Specified device does not support cbs offload");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_etf.c b/net/sched/sch_etf.c
index c74d778c32a1..7801e009e025 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_etf.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_etf.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int etf_enable_offload(struct net_device *dev, struct etf_sched_data *q,
struct tc_etf_qopt_offload etf = { };
int err;
- if (!ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+ if (!tc_can_offload(dev) || !ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Specified device does not support ETF offload");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c b/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
index f3e5ef9a9592..d853f3b60121 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int mqprio_init(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
* the queue mapping then run ndo_setup_tc otherwise use the
* supplied and verified mapping
*/
- if (qopt->hw) {
+ if (qopt->hw && tc_can_offload(dev)) {
err = mqprio_enable_offload(sch, qopt, extack);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index 300d577b3286..7451d74af91f 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ static int taprio_enable_offload(struct net_device *dev,
struct tc_taprio_caps caps;
int tc, err = 0;
- if (!ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+ if (!tc_can_offload(dev) || !ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
"Device does not support taprio offload");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-08 11:00 [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: protect driver_block_list in flow_block_cb_setup_simple() Shigeru Yoshida
2026-02-11 12:06 ` Florian Westphal
2026-02-13 2:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-13 11:30 ` Florian Westphal
2026-02-13 16:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-15 13:06 ` Florian Westphal
2026-02-17 11:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-02-17 22:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZRUFQGKzEdcjNHG@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=syoshida@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+5a66db916cdde0dbcc1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox