From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] nft_queue / test_udp_gro_ct flakes
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 16:11:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZcoDclA37Pk3UJp@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218184114.0b405b72@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:30:40 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Without the preceding patch, this fails with:
> >
> > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected udp conntrack entry
> > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected software segmentation to occur, had 10 and 0
>
> Hi Florian!
>
> This test case is a bit flaky for us on debug kernels:
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pass=0&test=nft-queue-sh
>
> It's 3rd flakiest of all netdev selftests at this point.
Ouch. Sorry about this, I will look at this asap.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 15:30 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/11] netfilter: updates for net-next Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert Florian Westphal
2026-02-11 5:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/11] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/11] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: add udp fraglist gro test case Florian Westphal
2026-02-19 2:41 ` [TEST] nft_queue / test_udp_gro_ct flakes Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-19 15:11 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/11] netfilter: flowtable: dedicated slab for flow entry Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/11] selftests: netfilter: add IPV6_TUNNEL to config Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/11] netfilter: nft_set_hash: fix get operation on big endian Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/11] netfilter: nft_counter: fix reset of counters on 32bit archs Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: fix bogus EEXIST with NLM_F_CREATE with null interval Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: check for partial overlaps in anonymous sets Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate element belonging to interval Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate open interval overlap Florian Westphal
2026-02-10 11:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-10 15:29 ` Florian Westphal
2026-02-11 3:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZcoDclA37Pk3UJp@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox