From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:50:09 +0400 Message-ID: References: <200910190002.39937.denys@visp.net.lb> <200910200308.57381.denys@visp.net.lb> <200910201436.50249.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Michal Ostrowski , Eric Dumazet , netdev , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, mostrows@earthlink.net To: Denys Fedoryschenko Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200910201436.50249.denys@visp.net.lb> Sender: linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/20/09, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote: > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 06:04:35 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> On 10/20/09, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote: >> > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 00:22:39 Michal Ostrowski wrote: >> >> I'm assuming that there was a race in us sending patches at nearly the >> >> same >> >> time I'm convinced now that the flush_lock can die, and the patch I >> >> sent >> >> out kills it. >> > >> > o_O >> > >> > I am drowning in patches. Just let me know which one to test :-) >> >> Oh ;) Try out latest Michal's patch (and then mine). I'll continue >> digg this issue at next spare time slot. Thanks! > Tried your patch, panic almost immediately > Here is a text of panic message over netconsole > http://www.nuclearcat.com/files/panic_pppoe3.txt > It is different now, before it was pppoe_device_event, now in pppoe_rcv > > Thanks a lot! I'll back with new one in a couple of hours. Meanwhile i suppose you may try Michal's patch as well.