From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE561327C1D; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 13:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772457985; cv=none; b=GnPvfECMIQP8uPfu42tPGHh2RiVpJ76fIhgjCWEb2FNwdZVC1pATO1kAvyT3g8Iagk/1jMLgHqPwc/IGcQ0wAFujjceX6dx2BVd/V6G00Wg4XU3T2p42hxlW+4h6JNBXrJsNI6KjLnxrsDgfPvEEh2uEHNI1U1FFrDARNm6nxzY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772457985; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Oq3083InT95hDnL0d3fLGwg40l2fjvqKCt9OdKGjoPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Tv/2PS8/BoGhdR7QETXBGVfK+7dPOjMzl7LVI+mKv1iNOrisQ6PYFeCspDZE51xmWlLjDnwbRttlgN8gsor46d2h8eFqPcxJ0mOGFu7OD7Byx9CC9AQX/EwcUUuS5ExHYmW8RdQNX/qXemqUEVMUo6H6wMm4ZaauJgzOhU2HWBc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=RmOZ4vL+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="RmOZ4vL+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772457976; x=1803993976; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Oq3083InT95hDnL0d3fLGwg40l2fjvqKCt9OdKGjoPU=; b=RmOZ4vL+Z78SFdb8MtllYFb6B3ASI1qhUucpg6hzmfK/MIx5k2n/K6GT uFQ5RQ4NYoK/8YsY3MSa5e04Ca3jJUs8PR8h5ziZaAlUDkNdqTQKQ5PCE DsrfK8fuN/Q5FoKdG3mQ4j399v6kve9kovpXUBTqPxmkyrB+bQoIoQEo8 j8GOLf/r1Tw52Cl2q8Z5fBmAGEFcFxis39+PxkDVm2jVHS/gRJ5ZbTIqR i/XX4lRW8FqMCvbNHPapvYOIh9OLAq8PZsu7wJEQa6yAhU1z4vN49ScFq aC1N+R+ie3Q8DvOdrBx0Ga5vptzCbWSXNweVp5tSHF0G49v7k0qrEJhwR Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: j/pdP1kHSLG2PpldPgiPXQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GmjW/NeSSaqmqBuIqm3vcg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11717"; a="84813196" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,320,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="84813196" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Mar 2026 05:26:15 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Z0dJ11j+RneoDliohktGbA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CzH7D8c/S2axnstD4ko87Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2026 05:26:12 -0800 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id B20A999; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:26:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:26:11 +0100 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Sean Chang , Chuck Lever , David Laight , nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Fix compiler warnings/errors in SUNRPC and MACB Message-ID: References: <20260301161709.1365975-1-seanwascoding@gmail.com> <0a784056-f57f-4634-aa7a-fd0b5916f40a@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0a784056-f57f-4634-aa7a-fd0b5916f40a@lunn.ch> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 06:39:44PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > - Verified via .lst and nm that both variables (buf) and helper functions > > (nlmdbg_cookie2a) are fully optimized out by the compiler when > > CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG is disabled. > > Thanks for doing this bit. It was needed to show my guess was correct. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn It already has your tag. My Q in v5 still stands: Why is this a series and not standalone changes? Also I just gave a tag, please split these two and send individually. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko