From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8FE375ADC for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 08:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772524965; cv=none; b=QSvIvQCivIDrg4btBqNWEc7BjjHYvC/1Zyp1JHcZXk6bD1Yt15j+q4kWAIoN4efYDJzdJur8vrqXamp78cgaolgpu+QcVRa9b4rlyqDxY88TSYVh3hgF0w5xsl8o7+dOb13I86YbLy7DtAw3HgvAA96qdf75hCDMcMKWVOxkchY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772524965; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jhRlGfBhb489U8ltCUEQB1pbYFEqF9EJuEmdtzSaZLc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=R5Q7z6wAtjCbbDkvI3WqjTbjhQZ54WxUmnqb6XhTafqOgCVcs10J8WAFLVcsr+Q95tDRm+JbaMYoOi9lBqzY7yJvf8CXoZWdLsXr5txSp7Xo30l3E/TBAgHj+MM46JoclFKMLDuRXUSDZQ+7YK4+4qUm/ul4CnXzhb8b6APZfwU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=j0fg4x5d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="j0fg4x5d" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772524964; x=1804060964; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jhRlGfBhb489U8ltCUEQB1pbYFEqF9EJuEmdtzSaZLc=; b=j0fg4x5dIw/mpKESjuq5u4qCSuZ3oqnCDzk2c9sQp30aQQZheL8K6I8k zRln229xYzZrlL8iNzGdQKHHYpwbcNx63qE4+RS6oAIbGwL8Md4tHDLuu gD/xaVkp0DQT1DhH6FBoRQ7zdJiJwT7kNe4nVino3KRjRpuw9+QGS7uV5 D0L+02lRfBm4QEj6uV9lrFHYZ83ChMOEqE6mZCedkj5fM5RE+3LhWik/Q sYZHOIP0CwzQwNSYgDUlkNUdMxPzUhuqEVstiMXyXTuz/93v0EAQU8Rpc VaE40Ubpmt1WFDAfYTKXcsOh2EKkISE8M+VZRakjpfBkICQP5afex/oKz Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FVpY8wEpTfGbRfwjl5yb7A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: N9Ddo6mRRiyBkra/xsYhpQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11717"; a="90948395" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,321,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="90948395" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2026 00:02:43 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fLrkU2CHRky8S1ml9zMRag== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1ZrI5mT2SqChC88s7QAIyw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,321,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="218030943" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.196]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2026 00:02:41 -0800 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 10:02:38 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tony Nguyen Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: Add missing header Message-ID: References: <20260302234105.2658400-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> <20260302234105.2658400-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260302234105.2658400-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 03:41:01PM -0800, Tony Nguyen wrote: > When cleaning up another header I have met this build error: > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_hmc.h:105:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'upper_32_bits' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 105 | val1 = (u32)(upper_32_bits(pa)); \ > > This is due to missing header, add it to fix the possible issue. There was a v2 with the other (missing here) tag is added (it was given against v1 conditionally) and Subject amendeded. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko