public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: fix dwmac4 transmit performance regression
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:42:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab2d7cc9-e7d9-47fb-95ad-90ae4f5f1f67@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1vgY1k-00000003vOC-0Z1H@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>

Hi Russell,

On 16/01/2026 01:49, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> dwmac4's transmit performance dropped by a factor of four due to an
> incorrect assumption about which definitions are for what. This
> highlights the need for sane register macros.
> 
> Commit 8409495bf6c9 ("net: stmmac: cores: remove many xxx_SHIFT
> definitions") changed the way the txpbl value is merged into the
> register:
> 
>         value = readl(ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_TX_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
> -       value = value | (txpbl << DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL_SHIFT);
> +       value = value | FIELD_PREP(DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL, txpbl);
> 
> With the following in the header file:
> 
>  #define DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL               BIT(16)
> -#define DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL_SHIFT         16
> 
> The assumption here was that DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL was the mask for
> DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL_SHIFT, but this turns out not to be the case.
> 
> The field is actually six bits wide, buts 21:16, and is called
> TXPBL.
> 
> What's even more confusing is, there turns out to be a PBLX8
> single bit in the DMA_CHAN_CONTROL register (0x1100 for channel 0),
> and DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL seems to be used for that. However, this bit
> et.al. was listed under a comment "/* DMA SYS Bus Mode bitmap */"
> which is for register 0x1004.
> 
> Fix this up by adding an appropriately named field definition under
> the DMA_CHAN_TX_CONTROL() register address definition.
> 
> Move the RPBL mask definition under DMA_CHAN_RX_CONTROL(), correctly
> renaming it as well.
> 
> Also move the PBL bit definition under DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(), correctly
> renaming it.
> 
> This removes confusion over the PBL fields.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Good job finding the problem ! However you need a Fixes tag, even though
ths is is for net-next.

It would also have been nice to be in CC, I spent some time on the bisect...

Besides that, problem solved on an imx8mp setup :)

Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>

Maxime
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.c | 8 ++++----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.h | 7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.c
> index 7036beccfc85..aaa83e9ff4f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void dwmac4_dma_init_rx_chan(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
>  	u32 rxpbl = dma_cfg->rxpbl ?: dma_cfg->pbl;
>  
>  	value = readl(ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_RX_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
> -	value = value | FIELD_PREP(DMA_BUS_MODE_RPBL_MASK, rxpbl);
> +	value = value | FIELD_PREP(DMA_CHAN_RX_CTRL_RXPBL_MASK, rxpbl);
>  	writel(value, ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_RX_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) && likely(dma_cfg->eame))
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void dwmac4_dma_init_tx_chan(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
>  	u32 txpbl = dma_cfg->txpbl ?: dma_cfg->pbl;
>  
>  	value = readl(ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_TX_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
> -	value = value | FIELD_PREP(DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL, txpbl);
> +	value = value | FIELD_PREP(DMA_CHAN_TX_CTRL_TXPBL_MASK, txpbl);
>  
>  	/* Enable OSP to get best performance */
>  	value |= DMA_CONTROL_OSP;
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void dwmac4_dma_init_channel(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
>  	/* common channel control register config */
>  	value = readl(ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
>  	if (dma_cfg->pblx8)
> -		value = value | DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL;
> +		value = value | DMA_CHAN_CTRL_PBLX8;
>  	writel(value, ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
>  
>  	/* Mask interrupts by writing to CSR7 */
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void dwmac410_dma_init_channel(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
>  	/* common channel control register config */
>  	value = readl(ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
>  	if (dma_cfg->pblx8)
> -		value = value | DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL;
> +		value = value | DMA_CHAN_CTRL_PBLX8;
>  
>  	writel(value, ioaddr + DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(dwmac4_addrs, chan));
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.h
> index 5f1e2916f099..9d9077a4ac9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_dma.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,6 @@
>  
>  #define DMA_SYS_BUS_MODE		0x00001004
>  
> -#define DMA_BUS_MODE_PBL		BIT(16)
> -#define DMA_BUS_MODE_RPBL_MASK		GENMASK(21, 16)
>  #define DMA_BUS_MODE_MB			BIT(14)
>  #define DMA_BUS_MODE_FB			BIT(0)
>  
> @@ -68,19 +66,22 @@ static inline u32 dma_chanx_base_addr(const struct dwmac4_addrs *addrs,
>  
>  #define DMA_CHAN_CONTROL(addrs, x)	dma_chanx_base_addr(addrs, x)
>  
> +#define DMA_CHAN_CTRL_PBLX8		BIT(16)
>  #define DMA_CONTROL_SPH			BIT(24)
>  
>  #define DMA_CHAN_TX_CONTROL(addrs, x)	(dma_chanx_base_addr(addrs, x) + 0x4)
>  
>  #define DMA_CONTROL_EDSE		BIT(28)
> +#define DMA_CHAN_TX_CTRL_TXPBL_MASK	GENMASK(21, 16)
>  #define DMA_CONTROL_TSE			BIT(12)
>  #define DMA_CONTROL_OSP			BIT(4)
>  #define DMA_CONTROL_ST			BIT(0)
>  
>  #define DMA_CHAN_RX_CONTROL(addrs, x)	(dma_chanx_base_addr(addrs, x) + 0x8)
>  
> -#define DMA_CONTROL_SR			BIT(0)
> +#define DMA_CHAN_RX_CTRL_RXPBL_MASK	GENMASK(21, 16)
>  #define DMA_RBSZ_MASK			GENMASK(14, 1)
> +#define DMA_CONTROL_SR			BIT(0)
>  
>  #define DMA_CHAN_TX_BASE_ADDR_HI(addrs, x)	(dma_chanx_base_addr(addrs, x) + 0x10)
>  #define DMA_CHAN_TX_BASE_ADDR(addrs, x)	(dma_chanx_base_addr(addrs, x) + 0x14)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-16  0:49 [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: fix dwmac4 transmit performance regression Russell King (Oracle)
2026-01-16  7:42 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-01-16 23:21   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-01-17  9:26     ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-01-19 14:19 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-03-13 15:03 ` Georg Gottleuber
2026-03-13 16:35   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-13 18:39     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-16 10:51       ` Georg Gottleuber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab2d7cc9-e7d9-47fb-95ad-90ae4f5f1f67@bootlin.com \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox