From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www2881.sakura.ne.jp (www2881.sakura.ne.jp [49.212.198.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A7428D8DA for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.212.198.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774077196; cv=none; b=IQvpsEEEYJuR701i4edd/Qhy4RjG8hmCJoxLNS2q0OiWxmfj9EVlLdFS3yv8jTubrOwChLcRf9IbiamJuTkGTThElyIQl20olCPGgJt53t4uQLL2BjmiPckbSqBL9Z2SV8miEZV93G9F8bNpGLKcfYmPUEFwobAuAiZXCLVsycM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774077196; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Jqzt1wohnmdJUD9hk9iya6d2TGTyD7GF60/4d6X/4zw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aCvHFljfpOGlZufCNEQmCtJ7gCa9QXkhL/HlImq2FGL4Z0fTSUfNLz3sUNV0o67HwXlLG5Xd750/HbVLTXcVpZoCylzYUkkHqgBi7eKRwKlOrh4w68Gvybm0c/Ku+djby5cCDfMwxQxUg4IzdWQ72MpiEyYsuPAJ1WHs1jG7wQE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=enjuk.jp; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=enjuk.jp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=enjuk.jp header.i=@enjuk.jp header.b=JtUb3ghT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.212.198.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=enjuk.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=enjuk.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=enjuk.jp header.i=@enjuk.jp header.b="JtUb3ghT" Received: from x1 (122.24.31.150.dy.iij4u.or.jp [150.31.24.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2881.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 62L7D5sQ089997 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:13:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kohei@enjuk.jp) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=uLHqQj34n75qO7wvSMbuHtDwvogwxolNUwo4NK7ta/8=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enjuk.jp; h=From:Message-ID:To:Subject:Date; s=rs20251215; t=1774077187; v=1; b=JtUb3ghTj8Ha7O9mQq0ln+SFa8s+LDZ6sqhDGYPYRCThvtIHq1s7BPV4oGxLVCSu 9ZhdJVH6Z8g0romwv0kGHa3Yn4tOComdMh3+tppz5xwxLKzJuDfeyrplmIWaQJMe NMcnnkgLnJHQMmG0PQehgDgpsiy9jznFTfRjkkGtt17sLx/2uWJtFD6Sl0Zt2zV8 xAp2fBRtGxIYzeBgUoNDOWYYtac187lGT683XJC0edMnEZwkcNhauiVhATFyigVB rhECiTCaonWgNuRol7JZWILWGki+7G2HrMF3OwbCwqxOdtjOldBUmDDPkVcnrJvT 6y5k+tk26L8Vqyn/x319ew== Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:13:05 +0900 From: Kohei Enju To: Tony Nguyen Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , dima.ruinskiy@intel.com, kohei.enju@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path Message-ID: References: <20260317062205.39406-1-kohei@enjuk.jp> <20260319161140.GI1753385@horms.kernel.org> <02552c4b-e4ba-4750-afc9-aaa2a671f964@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02552c4b-e4ba-4750-afc9-aaa2a671f964@intel.com> On 03/20 13:30, Tony Nguyen wrote: > > > On 3/19/2026 11:05 PM, Kohei Enju wrote: > > On 03/19 16:11, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 06:21:44AM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote: > > > > This series enables the build_skb RX path in igc, which is currently not > > > > enabled in any configuration. > > > > > > > > Patch 1/2 adds missing RX hardware timestamp handling in the build_skb > > > > path. > > > > Patch 2/2 enables the build_skb path when XDP is inactive and other > > > > conditions are met. > > > > > > > > Tested on Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04). > > > > > > > > Changes: > > > > v2: > > > > - don't insist on reverse christmas tree, reducing net diff in the > > > > patch 1/2 (Dima) > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20260307182808.155027-1-kohei@enjuk.jp/ > > > > > > > > Kohei Enju (2): > > > > igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() > > > > igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path > > > > > > For the series: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > > > Hi Tony, thanks for applying this series to next-queue. > > I have a question about the process of patch submission. > > > > Sometimes reviewers give RB tags for a whole series like this, but I > > think that those tags on the cover letter are not collected > > automatically, right? > > > > In this case, should I add RB tags to each patch if I respin for other > > reasons, or what is the recommended way to handle this? > > Hi Kohei, > > If you need to respin, feel free to carry the tags over. If you don't, I'll > bring them over. > > Thanks, > Tony > I understand. Thanks for explanation! Regards, Kohei