From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<larysa.zaremba@intel.com>, <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 5/8] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 13:21:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab6NTLRYG4LgqQn6@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab1s9J5yGxCbqB28@boxer>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 04:51:16PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:38:00AM +0100, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> writes:
> >
[...]
> > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > index 37b7a68b89b3..e9377b05118b 100644
> > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void xp_disable_drv_zc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
> > > int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> > > struct net_device *netdev, u16 queue_id, u16 flags)
> > > {
> > > + bool mbuf = flags & XDP_USE_SG;
> > > bool force_zc, force_copy;
> > > struct netdev_bpf bpf;
> > > int err = 0;
> > > @@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > >
> > > - if (flags & XDP_USE_SG)
> > > + if (mbuf)
> > > pool->umem->flags |= XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG;
> > >
> > > if (flags & XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP)
> > > @@ -200,10 +201,18 @@ int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> > > goto err_unreg_pool;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (netdev->xdp_zc_max_segs == 1 && (flags & XDP_USE_SG)) {
> > > + if (netdev->xdp_zc_max_segs == 1 && mbuf) {
> > > err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > goto err_unreg_pool;
> > > }
> > > +#define ETH_PAD_LEN (ETH_HLEN + 2 * VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
> >
> > Yuk! Move this somewhere else.
Forgot to respond here. I'm gonna just place it at the top of the file but
to properly address this we could introduce a common define for this
calculation, since we define it already three times, at least from intel
source code PoV + i assume i could easily dig up more open-coded examples:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h:73
#define ICE_ETH_PKT_HDR_PAD (ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN + (VLAN_HLEN * 2))
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h:115
#define I40E_PACKET_HDR_PAD (ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN + (VLAN_HLEN * 2))
include/net/libeth/rx.h:21
#define LIBETH_RX_LL_LEN (ETH_HLEN + 2 * VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
But such refactor is obviously a -next material.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-21 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 17:55 [PATCH v2 net 0/8] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/8] xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min frame Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:13 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-20 15:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/8] xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:14 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-20 15:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 3/8] ice: do not round up result of dbuf calculation for xsk pool Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:18 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-20 15:57 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 4/8] i40e: do not round up result of dbuff " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 5/8] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:38 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-20 15:51 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-21 12:21 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 6/8] selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:40 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 7/8] selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:41 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 net 8/8] selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect tailroom Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-20 8:42 ` Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab6NTLRYG4LgqQn6@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox