From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Baatz via B4 Relay <devnull+gmbnomis.gmail.com@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
mfreemon@cloudflare.com, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] tcp: implement RFC 7323 window retraction receiver requirements
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:34:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abCcf1opVAr8CvpL@gandalf.schnuecks.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310095806.121d198f@elisabeth>
Hi Stefano,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 09:58:07AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2026 09:02:26 +0100
> Simon Baatz via B4 Relay <devnull+gmbnomis.gmail.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > index f72eef31fa23cc584f2f0cefacdc35cae43aa52d..73aa2e0ccd1d7a6314a00c27950b019b62a3851c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > @@ -316,6 +316,9 @@ struct tcp_sock {
> > */
> > u32 app_limited; /* limited until "delivered" reaches this val */
> > u32 rcv_wnd; /* Current receiver window */
> > + u32 rcv_mwnd_seq; /* Maximum window sequence number (RFC 7323,
> > + * section 2.4, receiver requirements)
> > + */
>
> I didn't follow the rest of the discussion but, at this point, what
> does this mean for applications (CRIU, passt) dumping/restoring socket
> data? Do they have to adapt? I couldn't find this bit of information
> anywhere in v3.
Based on our discussion, the "Setting the TCP_REPAIR_WINDOW socket
option initializes rcv_mwnd_seq" v2 change addresses TCP window
restoration. As we said that information about window retraction is
not crucial, the window will be restored as "non-retracted", matching
prior behavior. Therefore, there is no change to the information
that applications need to dump or restore.
--
Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 8:02 [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] tcp: RFC 7323-compliant window retraction handling Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] tcp: implement RFC 7323 window retraction receiver requirements Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-09 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-09 18:35 ` Simon Baatz
2026-03-10 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-10 8:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-03-10 22:34 ` Simon Baatz [this message]
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] mptcp: keep rcv_mwnd_seq in sync with subflow rcv_wnd Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 8:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-11 18:27 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-11 22:08 ` Simon Baatz
2026-03-12 11:01 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] tcp: increase LINUX_MIB_BEYOND_WINDOW for SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_OVERWINDOW Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-09 9:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_rcv_wnd_shrink_nomem.pkt Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 8:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_rcv_wnd_shrink_allowed.pkt Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 8:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-09 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_rcv_neg_window.pkt Simon Baatz via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-10 23:09 ` Simon Baatz
2026-03-14 3:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-14 14:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-14 15:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-14 17:07 ` Simon Baatz
2026-03-16 21:51 ` Simon Baatz
2026-03-14 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] tcp: RFC 7323-compliant window retraction handling patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abCcf1opVAr8CvpL@gandalf.schnuecks.de \
--to=gmbnomis@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devnull+gmbnomis.gmail.com@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mfreemon@cloudflare.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox