From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liang Li <liali@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] bonding: fix multicast MAC address synchronization
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:41:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abDWSsK2Q3EybsG-@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL-iHkMmHKrnAeoW@fedora>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 03:42:30AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 04:04:54AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > On 8/5/25 10:09 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > > There is a corner case where the NS (Neighbor Solicitation) target is set to
> > > > an invalid or unreachable address. In such cases, all the slave links are
> > > > marked as down and set to *backup*. This causes the bond to add multicast MAC
> > > > addresses to all slaves. The ARP monitor then cycles through each slave to
> > > > probe them, temporarily marking as *active*.
> > > >
> > > > Later, if the NS target is changed or cleared during this probe cycle, the
> > > > *active* slave will fail to remove its NS multicast address because
> > > > bond_slave_ns_maddrs_del() only removes addresses from backup slaves.
> > > > This leaves stale multicast MACs on the interface.
> > > >
> > > > To fix this, we move the NS multicast MAC address handling into
> > > > bond_set_slave_state(), so every slave state transition consistently
> > > > adds/removes NS multicast addresses as needed.
> > > >
> > > > We also ensure this logic is only active when arp_interval is configured,
> > > > to prevent misconfiguration or accidental behavior in unsupported modes.
> > >
> > > As noted by Jay in the previous revision, moving the handling into
> > > bond_set_slave_state() could possibly impact a lot of scenarios, and
> > > it's not obvious to me that restricting to arp_interval != 0 would be
> > > sufficient.
> >
> > I understand your concern. The bond_set_slave_state() function is called by:
> > - bond_set_slave_inactive_flags
> > - bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags
> > - bond_set_slave_active_flags
> >
> > These functions are mainly invoked via bond_change_active_slave, bond_enslave,
> > bond_ab_arp_commit, and bond_miimon_commit.
> >
> > To avoid misconfiguration, in slave_can_set_ns_maddr() I tried to limit
> > changes to the backup slave when operating in active-backup mode with
> > arp_interval enabled. I also ensured that the multicast address is only
> > modified when the NS target is set.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if the issue could/should instead addressed explicitly
> > > handling the mac swap for the active slave at NS target change time. WDYT?
> >
> > The problem is that bond_hw_addr_swap() is only called in bond_ab_arp_commit()
> > during ARP monitoring, while the bond sets active/inactive flags in
> > bond_ab_arp_probe(). These operations are called partially.
> >
> > bond_activebackup_arp_mon
> > - bond_ab_arp_commit
> > - bond_select_active_slave
> > - bond_change_active_slave
> > - bond_hw_addr_swap
> > - bond_ab_arp_probe
> > - bond_set_slave_{active/inactive}_flags
> >
> > On the other hand, we need to set the multicast address on the *temporary*
> > active interface to ensure we can receive the replied NA message. The MAC
> > swap only happens when the *actual* active interface is chosen.
> >
> > This is why I chose to place the multicast address configuration in
> > bond_set_slave_state().
>
> Do you have any comments?
Hi Jay,
Could you add some comments?
Thanks
Hangbin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 8:09 [PATCHv2 net] bonding: fix multicast MAC address synchronization Hangbin Liu
2025-08-12 8:42 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-08-13 4:04 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-09-09 3:42 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-03-11 2:41 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abDWSsK2Q3EybsG-@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liali@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox