Re: [PATCH v2] sunrpc: simplify dprintk() macros and cleanup redundant debug guards

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:54:15PM +0800, Sean Chang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 5:47 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 10:07:25PM +0800, Sean Chang wrote:
> > > Following David Laight's suggestion, simplify the macro definitions by
> > > removing the unnecessary 'fmt' argument and using no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> > > directly.
> > >
> > > Verification with .lst files under -O2 confirms that the compiler
> > > successfully performs "dead code elimination". Even when variables
> > > (like char buf[] in nfsfh.c) or static helper functions (like
> > > nlmdbg_cookie2a() in svclock.c) are declared without #ifdef, they are
> > > completely optimized out (no stack allocation, no symbol references in
> > > the final executable) as they are only referenced within no_printk().
> >
> > Does this patch fixes also 202603110038.P6d14oxa-lkp@intel.com?
> 
> Regarding the LKP report:
> I have reproduced the Sparse warning (void vs int mismatch) locally.
> To resolve this, I'll use the do-while(0) form in v3 to ensure the macro
> always evaluates to void:
> -# define dfprintk(fac, ...)            no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> -# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, ...)        no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> +# define dfprintk(fac, ...)            do { no_printk(__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
> +# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, ...)        do { no_printk(__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)

Wouldn't be better to drop ({}) in nfs_error*() macros?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko