From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Prasanna Panchamukhi <panchamukhi@arista.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: expose gc_scan_interval_max via sysctl
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:10:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abNH3xxxAU7U4zz5@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACqWiXD2_O32K4NhmNBZrAUG7U9-N93LTFjJHG6Tq=4vuafNuA@mail.gmail.com>
Prasanna Panchamukhi <panchamukhi@arista.com> wrote:
> Our primary goal is to cap the maximum time taken by the GC to clean
> up expired entries. We rely on user-space notifications to clean up
> these entries from the hardware, so ensuring a predictable upper bound
> is important for our use case.
Sure, but why can't we try to give a better default behavior?
while true; conntrack -L >/dev/null;done
basically does what you want already (but in a dumb way).
> Regarding the adaptive strategy, we are using this sysctl to address
> environments where the current average-based calculation delays the
> cleanup of short-lived entries.
Yes, and I did propose to adapt the existing strategy to provide more
timely notifications.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 19:40 [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: expose gc_scan_interval_max via sysctl Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 12:12 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-12 12:15 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-12 21:44 ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 12:36 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-12 22:31 ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 22:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 23:10 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abNH3xxxAU7U4zz5@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=panchamukhi@arista.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox