From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3CF345721 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773401719; cv=none; b=d9chpzKSCJLsJrGgTnEG82YoJ6SZ+qsBP7JYVVsl+5OMbVr9kbC37TGeMV/1Da2SgGxxQgmcrav4ytRmpeV/xvOgA185NLEZc3yg1OQs9FuFP2Eo60PCQISR9+FIPtI0xI5BYsCeXr3LBecJ2dciFpn/R54+PjQwEFLQpx//SaY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773401719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6UUBpcPvPMAWRYqT1JRM1Mjfzyj2T0c0/GqtAU3kekg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uSM42SMODgQcyma5mkpqyjVmFmNf5LeK5DwoVNBFNX529CNoIdRknMOAZCVDcdCLLWSSRoSLjPH9rT5nlnZtA5TEoeFopMq5p9aD/W0AvY2mBYmJoHaXRBsrkk0o/EOdzIcVQ9tcR3Oy2DHZZ5t1Mg4rpPpj/dzK0esggN++6AE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=o6JNIl1M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="o6JNIl1M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E3B0C19421; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773401718; bh=6UUBpcPvPMAWRYqT1JRM1Mjfzyj2T0c0/GqtAU3kekg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=o6JNIl1MfZo9S0LPzeyR1gEJNG3JxCj/7FNZtIxtHQ/c0Pln/241h3TeIM0rcKeEs Qr4JPB8imfy4+s02TXe0/iMzV3geD63eEQXQUEfugyZuoYSU5SrKxc3ipDRV9Nxc71 MDkaopq+JvPWDzU5AYb5qnTPPh0GVeaHBH7yuuKYMCxYAlngD9rqWw4yX5LpFLi8Yv +tPO9Xbdl4yY0vV2p7YvMfYCu9bUM0P8bAk66FkSbwmjMHD/EJZicJhxmSvyPFEr9M qbwGNS+rcKCnBwOwQPru4ZZT50YABI/4tYzzwCNCV7uuFuA0aMvyytt7/M7RyFgCtS X0k8mFCwIO2vg== Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:35:16 +0100 From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: select QDMA block according LAN/WAN configuration Message-ID: References: <20260310-airoha-qdma-lan-wan-mode-v1-1-64ec74dea872@kernel.org> <20260312172430.GA1267298@kernel.org> <20260312172248.68742f98@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260312172248.68742f98@kernel.org> --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 22:14:36 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > Is this a bug fix? > > > If so, perhaps it is for net with a fixes tag. =20 > >=20 > > I guess we do not need to target net tree since airoha_eth driver curre= ntly > > supports just the LAN interface via the MT7530 DSA switch connected to = GDM1 > > and there are no WAN interfaces officially supported (PCS/external phy = is not > > merged mainline yet, it is only available in OpenWrt). > >=20 > > >=20 > > > And at any rate, could you add some description of the before and aft= er > > > behaviour? =20 > >=20 > > Theoretically, before this patch, GDM ports were equally distributed be= tween > > QDMA0 and QDMA1 while this patch assigns LAN interfaces to QDMA0 and WAN > > interface to QDMA1. However, for the reason explained above, this chang= e is > > not currently visible to the user. >=20 > Please update the commit message. And please try harder to explain=20 > the patches, this happens a lot with your submissions.. ack, fine. Sorry for not beeing very clear about this (and other patches), I will pay more attention in the future. Do you think we should target net-next or net for this patch? Regards, Lorenzo --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTquNwa3Txd3rGGn7Y6cBh0uS2trAUCabP2dAAKCRA6cBh0uS2t rE54AQC1mMaAyrYlZgokGGCJNLPOxAyImBcax4o0k8v1VJY9UwEA0dzu7dEQaV39 KehzNqgq9qHcA+qpmY3Zu8uwmj+WzAc= =9Tm6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk--