From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF2179CD for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773388109; cv=none; b=KPxyhruBvOm7+mRQedQ/EMvP0dGYlFkPAf6W5Eb6WvmatS0TzXZL0h0hCp1mEJ6dDcUpWFBuweY0DH9pc2W7p88NdIaVAGzFTiaS9a1YLzAG6edNtefrOOOLk3X9lhuVdWZChCjIm44qku6euShV9Ox1E6lP0ICo9WrPB9/8Xp8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773388109; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oMoLqytWvqlbh9nTZunhUVkMxpOK58oR2YWmxsGChYk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XrvEjzZzAARhyE0ivE7IKg+MQqu0bDoNAOvn6al95OPuqqQtwSGs1qfdZIzIRTkGgWqq24uxmE353NIrwZahX2eEcDI2iHgeDZwN4Gyz60GMDtozASkbZvoQoGOJT3M41o2IX8zBN65sEf1ehrnzb1KTPVhxU1nwZ+9DaK64IZc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b=VZ3BO9kY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b="VZ3BO9kY" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86C8207C1; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:48:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IELiMnh6aWMl; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:48:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from EXCH-01.secunet.de (rl1.secunet.de [10.32.0.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB0520590; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:48:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com 4CB0520590 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1773388098; bh=L1ua3y1FLcim1VBLtNc4NWQySV15oFdT5AA8hmWo8bY=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VZ3BO9kYJfakBruSgMJtfuSvdczWAL0dl2oodZ7FsVepmqyHYbUjr179QUPtImjnd Hw49l6hFX+aUgzVof92k3qLNrwMuhetmIL7pa/SC4AcTQTl7ouGd4DHryE3YPfj1p0 lxXueaSW08bVnqYfEGZQLqHy5/wRQCKCAtpTTg94FsaNH0LFhoNfl5H1SHgW04u72i wQBRGOYfpE4JCLpPevAa2N112Wz4ItKmbYrBhqDuGhGnbN2h9voAHnrX5UKHtG8aGL qM6C+SWm9/8GyWq0YWnocyDMCKCqeePVPHZ7ZhQl55qCwOOMtBBHto91l9kGwycQbv kpDwHCsD1zG5Q== Received: from secunet.com (10.182.7.193) by EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:48:17 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 3685931 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:48:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:48:17 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Sabrina Dubroca CC: , Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 00/10] xfrm: fix most sparse warnings Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) To EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > This series fixes most of the sparse warnings currently reported about > RCU pointers for files under net/xfrm. There's no actual bug in the > current code, we only need to use the correct helpers in each context. > > Sabrina Dubroca (10): > xfrm: state: fix sparse warnings on xfrm_state_hold_rcu > xfrm: state: fix sparse warnings in xfrm_state_init > xfrm: state: fix sparse warnings around XFRM_STATE_INSERT > xfrm: state: add xfrm_state_deref_prot to state_by* walk under lock > xfrm: remove rcu/state_hold from xfrm_state_lookup_spi_proto > xfrm: state: silence sparse warnings during netns exit > xfrm: policy: fix sparse warnings in xfrm_policy_{init,fini} > xfrm: policy: silence sparse warning in xfrm_policy_unregister_afinfo > xfrm: add rcu_access_pointer to silence sparse warning for > xfrm_input_afinfo > xfrm: avoid RCU warnings around the per-netns netlink socket Series applied, thanks a ot Sabrina!