From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alejandro Olivan Alvarez <alejandro.olivan.alvarez@gmail.com>,
1130336@bugs.debian.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression] Network failure beyond first connection after 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count if add was skipped")
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 20:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abW2MAAqLnKZm3KF@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3cbfd15-acd1-4500-ba30-eac6f48523fb@suse.de>
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:
> On 3/14/26 5:13 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 3/14/26 3:03 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Control: forwarded -1
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/ regressions/177349610461.3071718.4083978280323144323@eldamar.lan
> > > Control: tags -1 + upstream
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In Debian, in https://bugs.debian.org/1130336, Alejandro reported that
> > > after updates including 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit:
> > > update the count if add was skipped"), when the following rule is set
> > >
> > > iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m
> > > connlimit --connlimit-above 111 -j
> > > REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
> > >
> > > connections get stuck accordingly, it can be easily reproduced by:
> > >
> > > # iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m connlimit
> > > --connlimit-above 111 -j REJECT
> > > --reject-with tcp-reset
> > > # nft list ruleset
> > > # Warning: table ip filter is managed by iptables-nft, do not touch!
> > > table ip filter {
> > > chain INPUT {
> > > type filter hook input priority filter; policy accept;
> > > ip protocol tcp xt
> > > match "connlimit" counter packets 0
> > > bytes 0 reject with tcp reset
> > > }
> > > }
> > > # wget -O /dev/null
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:51--
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > Resolving git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)... 172.105.64.184,
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|172.105.64.184|:443...
> > > connected.
> > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
> > > Location: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/
> > > linux.git/snapshot/linux-7.0-rc3.tar.gz
> > > [following]
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:51--
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/ git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-7.0-rc3.tar.gz
> > > Reusing existing connection to git.kernel.org:443.
> > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> > > Length: unspecified [application/x-gzip]
> > > Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
> > >
> > > /dev/null [
> > > <=> ] 248.03M
> > > 51.9MB/s in 5.0s
> > >
> > > 2026-03-14 14:53:56 (49.3 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [260080129]
> > >
> > > # wget -O /dev/null
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:58--
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > Resolving git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)... 172.105.64.184,
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|172.105.64.184|:443...
> > > failed: Connection timed out.
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25|:443...
> > > failed: Network is unreachable.
> > >
> > > Before the 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count
> > > if add was skipped") commit this worked.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the report. I have reproduced
> > this on upstream kernel. I am working on it.
> >
>
> This is what is happening:
>
> 1. The first connection is established and
> tracked, all good. When it finishes, it goes to
> TIME_WAIT state
> 2. The second connection is established, ct is
> confirmed since the beginning, skipping the
> tracking and calling a GC.
> 3. The previously tracked connection is cleaned
> up during GC as TIME_WAIT is considered closed.
This is stupid. The fix is to add --syn or use
OUTPUT. Its not even clear to me what the user wants to achive with this rule.
> +static inline bool tcp_syn_sent_or_recv(const struct nf_conn *conn)
> +{
> + if (nf_ct_protonum(conn) == IPPROTO_TCP)
> + return conn->proto.tcp.state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT ||
> + conn->proto.tcp.state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_RECV;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
We're adding ever more complex checks in the conncount backend.
I don't like any of the solutions.
What about reverting the offending commit, at least for tree_count?
That way it continues to work as it did in the past.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-14 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-14 14:03 [regression] Network failure beyond first connection after 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count if add was skipped") Salvatore Bonaccorso
2026-03-14 16:13 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-14 19:00 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-14 19:25 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-03-15 1:09 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-18 12:49 ` Bug#1130336: " Salvatore Bonaccorso
2026-03-19 8:44 ` Alejandro Oliván Alvarez
2026-03-19 8:59 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abW2MAAqLnKZm3KF@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=1130336@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=alejandro.olivan.alvarez@gmail.com \
--cc=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox