public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
To: "Ruinskiy, Dima" <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
Cc: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"kohei.enju@gmail.com" <kohei.enju@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb()
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 23:09:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aba7x6y1uuSp--tH@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25df2a93-07c8-477e-9717-fb4a815cff2c@intel.com>

On 03/15 15:56, Ruinskiy, Dima wrote:

[...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > index ebd831a4ff53..3a4c1ebe4faa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > @@ -1964,13 +1964,16 @@ static void igc_add_rx_frag(struct igc_ring
> > > *rx_ring,
> > > 
> > >   static struct sk_buff *igc_build_skb(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,
> > >   				     struct igc_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
> > > -				     struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > > +				     struct igc_xdp_buff *ctx)
> > >   {
> > > -	unsigned int size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> > > -	unsigned int truesize = igc_get_rx_frame_truesize(rx_ring,
> > > size);
> > > -	unsigned int metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
> > > +	unsigned int size, truesize, metasize;
> > > +	struct xdp_buff *xdp = &ctx->xdp;
> > >   	struct sk_buff *skb;
> > > 
> > > +	size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> > > +	truesize = igc_get_rx_frame_truesize(rx_ring, size);
> > > +	metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
> > > +
> In the spirit of consistency, would it be possible to restructure the
> variable initialization to match that of igc_construct_skb()? Initialize xdp
> first, and then all the size variable inits can stay as they are. It would
> make the net change smaller.

I followed the reverse christmas tree convention used in netdev, but
your suggestion make sense as well.

I'll make that change in v2.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-15 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-07 18:27 [PATCH iwl-next v1 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path Kohei Enju
2026-03-07 18:27 ` [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() Kohei Enju
2026-03-10  7:43   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-15 13:56     ` Ruinskiy, Dima
2026-03-15 14:09       ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2026-03-07 18:27 ` [PATCH iwl-next v1 2/2] igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path Kohei Enju
2026-03-10  7:44   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aba7x6y1uuSp--tH@x1 \
    --to=kohei@enjuk.jp \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kohei.enju@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox