From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Robert Malz <robert.malz@canonical.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl v3] ice: retry reading NVM if admin queue returns EBUSY
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abe7fbc3-522c-4eb4-989d-21270f1ef2af@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADcc-bwC4FGQSGyRcnj2ZpGT5+0Q6mjQd-FTCB-mCmmwYrC8Qw@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/26/26 10:15, Robert Malz wrote:
> Hey Przemek,
> I ran some tests and unfortunately, the following sentence from the
> datasheet is true:
> "For specific resources, such as Change Lock (0x0003) and Global Config Lock
> (0x0004), this field is used by software to override the default timeout for the
> operation, and also to specify the timeout used for this operation."
>
> This means we can only change a default timeout for 0x0003 and 0x0004
> but not for 0x0001 (NVM resource).
> Whatever timeout I provide FW defaults to 0xB88
> Input:
> [ 2209.656758] ice 0000:31:00.0: CQ CMD: opcode 0x0008, flags 0x2000,
> datalen 0x0000, retval 0x0000
> [ 2209.656760] ice 0000:31:00.0: cookie (h,l) 0x00000000 0x00000000
> [ 2209.656761] ice 0000:31:00.0: param (0,1) 0x00010001 0x00000BB9
> Output:
> [ 2209.656927] ice 0000:31:00.0: CQ CMD: opcode 0x0008, flags 0x2003,
> datalen 0x0000, retval 0x0000
> [ 2209.656929] ice 0000:31:00.0: cookie (h,l) 0x00000000 0x00000000
> [ 2209.656931] ice 0000:31:00.0: param (0,1) 0x00010001 0x00000BB8
>
> Correct me If I'm wrong, but the only way to properly handle it is to
> ensure the resource is locked and released between every
> ice_acquire_nvm call.
> I'll start working on this.
thank you for checking out!
I agree that simple retries with improved (refactored) locking will be
good solution.
Failure to lock should count as an unsuccessful attempt, with possible
retry after a sleep.
>
> Regards,
> Robert
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 12:07 [PATCH iwl v3] ice: retry reading NVM if admin queue returns EBUSY Robert Malz
2026-06-18 15:20 ` Simon Horman
2026-06-24 11:15 ` Robert Malz
2026-06-25 7:53 ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-06-25 10:14 ` Robert Malz
2026-06-26 8:15 ` Robert Malz
2026-06-26 11:46 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abe7fbc3-522c-4eb4-989d-21270f1ef2af@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.malz@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox