From: Charles Perry <charles.perry@microchip.com>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Charles Perry <charles.perry@microchip.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Initial support for PIC64-HPSC/HX Ethernet endpoint
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:47:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abhQTWsPI6TfpWxh@bby-cbu-swbuild03.eng.microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DH4DU4Z4X9MM.398FQ3BIZQIJB@bootlin.com>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:28:39PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> On Fri Mar 13, 2026 at 3:06 PM CET, Charles Perry wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series add basic support for Microchip "PIC64-HPSC" and "PIC64HX"
> > Ethernet endpoint. Both SoCs contain 4 GEM IP with support for
> > MII/RGMII/SGMII/USXGMII at rates of 10M to 10G. Only RGMII and SGMII at a
> > rate of 1G is tested for now. Each GEM IP has 8 priority queues and the
> > revision register reads 0x220c010e.
>
> Do you have plans to test higher rate? We might get our hands on GEMs
> that support >1G and would like to know if CCing you would make sense.
Yes. I don't have a 10G setup right now but that's definitively in my TODO
list for this year.
>
> > One particularity of this instantiation of GEM is that the MDIO controller
> > within the GEM IP is disconnected from any physical pin and the SoC rely on
> > another standalone MDIO controller.
>
> Ah, that means you instantiate the MDIO bus for no good reason.
> Code looks like:
>
> static int macb_mii_init(struct macb *bp)
> {
> struct device_node *mdio_np, *np = bp->pdev->dev.of_node;
> int err = -ENXIO;
>
> /* With fixed-link, we don't need to register the MDIO bus,
> * except if we have a child named "mdio" in the device tree.
> * In that case, some devices may be attached to the MACB's MDIO bus.
> */
> mdio_np = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
> if (!mdio_np && of_phy_is_fixed_link(np))
> return macb_mii_probe(bp->dev);
>
> // ... probe MDIO bus ...
> }
>
> So to *not* get the bus we need to be in fixed link config. Do you care
> about that? I think that the proper fix would be to lazy probe the MDIO
> bus until a PHY (ours or some other MAC's) asks for it.
Yes, I do have a bunch of unusable MDIO buses in sysfs. It would be great
if those just didn't exist but that would be yet more code and one more
MACB_CAPS for little benefit IMO.
As for the fixed link, I can't specify that just to not instantiate the
MDIO bus because that would cause other problems since my link has a PHY
with a negotiated rate/duplex/etc.
Thanks,
Charles
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 14:06 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Initial support for PIC64-HPSC/HX Ethernet endpoint Charles Perry
2026-03-13 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: add a compatible for Microchip pic64hpsc Charles Perry
2026-03-17 15:31 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-13 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: macb: add safeguards for jumbo frame larger than 10240 Charles Perry
2026-03-16 17:21 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-16 18:26 ` Charles Perry
2026-03-17 12:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-17 15:32 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-13 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: macb: add support for Microchip pic64hpsc ethernet endpoint Charles Perry
2026-03-17 15:32 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-16 17:28 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Initial support for PIC64-HPSC/HX Ethernet endpoint Théo Lebrun
2026-03-16 18:47 ` Charles Perry [this message]
2026-03-17 12:31 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-17 12:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abhQTWsPI6TfpWxh@bby-cbu-swbuild03.eng.microchip.com \
--to=charles.perry@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox