From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: macb: allow MTU changes while the interface is running
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:42:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abmtcI4NX_zFyAwA@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316092720.39198-1-nb@tipi-net.de>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:27:20AM +0100, Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> macb_change_mtu() currently returns -EBUSY if the interface is running,
> requiring users to bring the interface down before changing the MTU. This
> is unnecessarily restrictive.
>
> Instead, close and reopen the interface around the MTU change so that RX
> DMA buffers are reallocated for the new MTU. This is the same approach
> used by many other network drivers (e.g. igb, tg3, stmmac).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> index 5e27e0e87a55..8dd01031250d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> @@ -3262,11 +3262,16 @@ static int macb_close(struct net_device *dev)
>
> static int macb_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> {
> - if (netif_running(dev))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + bool was_running = netif_running(dev);
> +
> + if (was_running)
> + macb_close(dev);
>
> WRITE_ONCE(dev->mtu, new_mtu);
>
> + if (was_running)
> + return macb_open(dev);
Would you like to keep the new_mtu set, even if macb_open() fails?
Other than that, it looks good to me.
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 9:27 [PATCH net-next] net: macb: allow MTU changes while the interface is running Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-03-17 17:00 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-17 19:31 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-03-17 22:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-17 22:58 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-03-17 23:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-18 9:53 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-18 11:25 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-03-18 14:33 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-18 22:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-17 19:42 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-03-17 19:47 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-17 20:11 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-03-17 20:04 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abmtcI4NX_zFyAwA@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox