From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<horms@kernel.org>, <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
<aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>, <bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 13:12:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac5PKvH7ZGZTT5s6@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331150213.550797-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 05:02:02PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
FWIW I'll be sending v6 as I messed up refcounting scheme on error path
for shared umem. I'm gonna also put on shelf driver cleanups as I got fed
up with issues reported by Sashiko. I plan to get back to it if I get to
work on forbidding mtu change feature on interfaces loaded with xsk
sockets.
> v4->v5:
> - add further review tags from Bjorn
> - fix ./test_progs -t xsk
> * do so by making the procfs reading common so test_xsk.c can use it
> - get back to idea of relying on pool->umem->zc in
> xsk_pool_get_tailroom(); that is because we now call its caller
> (xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size()) before getting down to driver via
> ndo_bpf - we do it to rule out invalid setups in terms of MTU vs xsk
> frame size/number of exposed segments by driver
> - bring back explicit rejection of mbuf && segs == 1 combo
>
> v3->v4:
> - allow exact 128 bytes of space when user defined headroom is deducted
> from total frame size
> - provide a routine for reading procfs entries within xskxceiver
> * use it to fetch cache line size and calculate skb_shared_info size
> on our own
> - clean up gve and igc xsk pool enablement routines
> - include mtu vs frame size * max zc segments validation in
> xp_assign_dev()
>
> v2->v3:
> - add tags from Bjorn/Stan
> - provide at least 128 bytes instead ETH_ZLEN when validating frame
> headroom
> * this way we can get rid of i40e/ice changes
> * make sure xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() returns value 128b-aligned
> * and remove pre-check from idpf
> - separate XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG fixes from MTU validation in xsk_bind()
> - make drop_idx a local variable in xsk's xdp drop prog
> - adjust rx_dropped to new 128b related values
> - move ugly placed define (Bjorn)
> - remove READ_ONCE when fetching netdev->mtu (Bjorn)
>
> v1->v2:
> - remove xsk_pool_get_tailroom() definition for !CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS
> (Stan)
> - do not rely on pool->umem->zc when configuring tailroom (Stan, Bjorn)
> - simplify dbuff setting in ZC drivers (Bjorn)
> - use defines for {head,tail}room in tests (Bjorn)
> - return EINVAL instead of EOPNOTSUPP when mtu setting is wrong (Bjorn)
> - include vlan headers and fcs length when validating mtu (Olek)
> - tighten umem headroom validation when registering umem (Sashiko AI)
> - set XDP_USE_SG in xp_assign_dev_shared() (Sashiko AI)
> - adjust rx dropped xskxceiver test
>
> Hi,
>
> here we fix a long-standing issue regarding multi-buffer scenario in ZC
> mode - we have not been providing space at the end of the buffer where
> multi-buffer XDP works on skb_shared_info. This has been brought to our
> attention via [0].
>
> Unaligned mode does not get any specific treatment, it is user's
> responsibility to properly handle XSK addresses in queues.
>
> With adjustments included here in this set against xskxceiver I have
> been able to pass the full test suite on ice.
>
> Thanks,
> Maciej
>
> [0]: https://community.intel.com/t5/Ethernet-Products/X710-XDP-Packet-Corruption-Issue-DRV-MODE-Zero-Copy-Multi-Buffer/m-p/1724208
>
>
> Maciej Fijalkowski (11):
> xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min
> frame
> xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups
> xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues
> xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind
> selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs
> selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests
> selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test
> selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect
> tailroom
> idpf: remove xsk frame size check against alignment
> igc: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation
> gve: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c | 5 --
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/xsk.c | 10 ----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_xdp.c | 11 ----
> include/net/xdp_sock.h | 2 +-
> include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h | 17 +++++-
> net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 3 +-
> net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 25 ++++++++-
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 55 +++++++++----------
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h | 23 ++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c | 19 +++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c | 4 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 23 ++++++++
> 12 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 15:02 [PATCH v5 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 01/11] xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min frame Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 02/11] xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 03/11] xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 04/11] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 05/11] selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 06/11] selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 07/11] selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 08/11] selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect tailroom Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 09/11] idpf: remove xsk frame size check against alignment Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 10/11] igc: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-31 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 net 11/11] gve: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 11:12 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac5PKvH7ZGZTT5s6@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox