From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B44241690; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 04:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774327851; cv=none; b=W4lpA4xHvUAjE8A9rH6OkAI7UYN7dGg2ly5XuUDZfwP6WEzcJZSllqFFcCDK2iTOuBXtl3fJzVeYb2tOXHsJvFzsiHqJJrpBB5fK3f1Tupmig6Bov4+0rL6xAfRm7Fqjj4/C/2a2BGWAv7HHuYTqbPrUPlh1BBtwF6/Ds82EKWo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774327851; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DiB0f7hBkm4xTl0rCXcgjzj3hVLAwEfZ1qgUHaZNGgE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q2fP+5W9MzhqII8xZ+1q0TS7dTR1LIVlp7wrdMFdeK4eUYDeJ1Z/JaeYz0rpJBVfJgql5n0gzMrL3mijHjW1frPnuszLU5AyaVeLyIXSgVt4d+ZcX4nUhr8ZKjfy7XJHTNV5ECmLXsr+CYirRXwzzHEdUaw7ynyppGz517ynb78= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=GMGmbIq9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="GMGmbIq9" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 711FC14C2D6; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:50:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1774327839; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AywlPwBr7VbBdaTZBe7nUDkqgnRgV0ycrC7PoFcyewk=; b=GMGmbIq9QBV7dHSUbUKsyAs7J7UJP3XKLoQD/dixlUxixPk8cWtrjhw+K5uzUgEim7Kjvb XOsiu77UVEfk6en6P4kNtvMtNqSTWroJQOnQ1TTOJryRuWZi6PcNlM84e78Fiep/LXtTaU cgB4eA+SVIA23pKAAwl4c1DvathaMMGPCyKAsI/OBwzl/DkrvpiORbyPJVP+htGzBVoSPg SzFm2CnWxx6oPtFdhKZfsuUK6g0vck8ajPuzbtHhXI7tU/h34G1qSm+IjfOL1v2pjzeuw1 ReM6EQvJtmBDJx6Zt6PTBTMIzKE5eSI00+LO1BU/WuwHwMEcbb6ZrCzRQihVIA== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 47767c77; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 04:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:50:18 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Eric_Terminal Cc: Simon Horman , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , v9fs@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , bridge@lists.linux.dev, Anna Schumaker , Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] net: replace deprecated simple_strto* parsers with kstrto* Message-ID: References: <20260225010853.15916-1-ericterminal@gmail.com> <20260225033840.33000-1-ericterminal@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Eric_Terminal wrote on Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 12:27:50PM +0800: > Hi Simon and maintainers, > > Just a gentle ping on this patch series. > > Following up on my previous email regarding the testing methodology > (using virtme-ng, verifying the Oops fix in Patch 1, and confirming > the strictness of strsep + kstrtouint). > > Does the provided testing information address the concerns? Please let > me know if there's anything else I should clarify, or if a v3 is > needed to move this forward. Part of the problem is that you've mixed a semi-complex 9p patch with other net patches, I think it'd be easiser to move forward if you'd split this (I can't take non-9p patches, and I'm not sure the -net tree wants the 9p patches as we're a small world appart sometimes...) For 9p, I can't (easily) test xen, so I'd appreciate if you could resend with Stefano Stabellini in Ccs as he has been looking after this transport; I can have a quick look but don't have the time for a proper review Thanks, -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus