public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
To: luka.gejak@linux.dev
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	liuhangbin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 13:01:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acZxlczkaUE9dVGQ@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326174600.136232-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 06:45:58PM +0100, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>
> Changes in v2:
>  - dropped trivial cleanup-only patches per netdev clean-up policy
>  - added AI attribution for cover-letter/commit-message wording only
>  - dropped fallthrough/BIT conversion patches per review

Thank you for updating (and limiting) the series.

> This series contains two focused HSR cleanups with practical benefit.
> It constifies protocol operation tables and replaces a hardcoded
> function name with __func__ to keep diagnostics correct across
> refactoring.
> Assisted-by: Copilot:gpt-5.3-codex (cover-letter/commit-message wording
> only)
>
> Luka Gejak (2):
>   net: hsr: constify hsr_ops and prp_ops protocol operation structures
>   net: hsr: use __func__ instead of hardcoded function name

The patches look good to me, so for the series:
Reviewed-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>

Thanks,
   Felix


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-26 17:45 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization luka.gejak
2026-03-26 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: hsr: constify hsr_ops and prp_ops protocol operation structures luka.gejak
2026-03-26 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: hsr: use __func__ instead of hardcoded function name luka.gejak
2026-03-27 12:01 ` Felix Maurer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acZxlczkaUE9dVGQ@thinkpad \
    --to=fmaurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox