From: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
To: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_setup()
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 22:38:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac_Bo2Ra7UuvXe6e@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327073046.134085-7-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
On 03/27 08:30, Aleksandr Loktionov wrote:
> From: Sebastian Basierski <sebastianx.basierski@intel.com>
>
> ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_setup() is always called from process context (FCoE
> offload setup paths) and never from an atomic context. Using
> GFP_ATOMIC is therefore unnecessarily restrictive and wastes memory
> allocator headroom that is reserved for genuine atomic callers.
> Replace the dma_pool_alloc() flag with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Basierski <sebastianx.basierski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c
> index 011fda9..7fa0971 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_setup(struct net_device *netdev, u16 xid,
> }
>
> /* alloc the udl from per cpu ddp pool */
> - ddp->udl = dma_pool_alloc(ddp_pool->pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &ddp->udp);
> + ddp->udl = dma_pool_alloc(ddp_pool->pool, GFP_KERNEL, &ddp->udp);
Commit fa39ab5184d6 ("scsi: fcoe: Fix I/O path allocation") had introduced
this GFP_ATOMIC flag, since some IO paths called this function with a
spin_lock held. Now, is it safe to roll back this change?
> if (!ddp->udl) {
> e_err(drv, "failed allocated ddp context\n");
> goto out_noddp_unmap;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 7:30 [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: increase SWFW semaphore timeout for X550 FW updates Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: add bounds check for debugfs register access Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:36 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: clean up adaptive interrupt moderation algorithm Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:31 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: remove ixgbe_ping_all_vfs() from watchdog link-up handler Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: use ktime_get_real_ns() in ixgbe_ptp_reset() Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:10 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-03 13:11 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-03 20:26 ` Keller, Jacob E
2026-04-06 14:07 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: call ixgbe_setup_fc() before fc_enable() after NVM update Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:38 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-03 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_setup() Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2026-04-03 13:38 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: fix cls_u32 nexthdr path returning success when no entry installed Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:46 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: use int instead of u32 for error code variables Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:41 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr() Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 8:41 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-03 10:00 ` David Laight
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: fix ITR value overflow in adaptive interrupt throttling Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 13:18 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-03 16:12 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-06 14:06 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-27 7:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: extend 5 s SWFW semaphore timeout to all X550EM variants Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-03 20:55 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-04-03 12:49 ` [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: increase SWFW semaphore timeout for X550 FW updates Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac_Bo2Ra7UuvXe6e@x1 \
--to=kohei@enjuk.jp \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox