From: mohammad heib <mheib@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:36:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acb60edf-0be5-4719-8f13-00cdbd1bb491@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708143601.1491656-1-horms@kernel.org>
Hi Simon
Thank you for the review.
On 7/8/26 5:36 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
> ---
> i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level
>
> This commit moves the ATR sample rate configuration from the per-ring level
> to the PF level. It initializes the sample rate globally during software init
> and updates the fast path to reference the PF structure.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> index a04683004a567..4d4d4b07a0f3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -3454,12 +3454,7 @@ static int i40e_configure_tx_ring(struct i40e_ring *ring)
>> ring->xsk_pool = i40e_xsk_pool(ring);
>>
>> /* some ATR related tx ring init */
>> - if (test_bit(I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA, vsi->back->flags)) {
>> - ring->atr_sample_rate = I40E_DEFAULT_ATR_SAMPLE_RATE;
>> - ring->atr_count = 0;
>> - } else {
>> - ring->atr_sample_rate = 0;
>> - }
>> + ring->atr_count = 0;
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does removing this per-ring initialization remove the protection against
> dynamic ethtool flag toggles?
>
> Previously, if the ring was configured while Flow Director ATR was disabled,
> the ring's sample rate was cached to 0 in i40e_configure_tx_ring(). This
> prevented descriptor injection even if the PF flag was later toggled on
> without a ring reset.
>
The per-ring zeroing of atr_sample_rate was redundant. i40e_atr()
already checks I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA before it ever looks at atr_sample_rate:
/* make sure ATR is enabled */
if (!test_bit(I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA, pf->flags))
return;
if (test_bit(__I40E_FD_ATR_AUTO_DISABLED, pf->state))
return;
/* if sampling is disabled do nothing */
if (!pf->atr_sample_rate)
return;
When ATR is disabled via ethtool private flags, the function bails out
at the I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA check regardless of what atr_sample_rate is
set to. The flag check is the real protection the per-ring sample rate
cache was never the thing providing protection against dynamic toggling.
> [ ... ]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
>> index 894f2d06d39d0..b36e0fc9b31d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -2879,7 +2879,7 @@ static void i40e_atr(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> return;
>>
>> /* if sampling is disabled do nothing */
>> - if (!tx_ring->atr_sample_rate)
>> + if (!pf->atr_sample_rate)
>> return;
>
> [Severity: High]
> Can this global check lead to a hardware Malicious Driver Detection (MDD)
> event if ethtool flags are modified dynamically?
>
> If an administrator performs the following sequence:
>
> 1. Disables flow-director-atr via ethtool.
> 2. Disables ntuple (which resets the ring and sets tx_ctx.fd_ena = 0).
> 3. Re-enables flow-director-atr.
>
> The final step does not trigger a ring reset, so fd_ena remains 0 in the
> hardware queue context.
>
> However, I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA is now true, and pf->atr_sample_rate is
> globally set to a non-zero value.
>
> Will i40e_atr() now proceed and inject FDIR descriptors into a TX queue
> that is not configured for FDIR?
>
> If so, does this cause the hardware to trigger an MDD event and hang the
> TX queue?
>
The scenario you described was already broken before this patch, walking
through the old code with the same sequence:
1. Disable ATR — flag cleared, __I40E_FD_ATR_AUTO_DISABLED set
2. Disable ntuple — ring reset happens, i40e_configure_tx_ring() runs
with ATR off, so ring->atr_sample_rate = 0 and fd_ena = 0
3. Re-enable ATR — flag set, no ring reset
In the old code, ring->atr_sample_rate is stuck at 0 from step 2, so
i40e_atr() bails out at the sample rate check. That avoids the fd_ena
problem, but ATR is also silently non-functional
— the user re-enabled it but it doesn't actually work until something
triggers a ring reset.
This patch changes how that failure looks, instead of silently doing
nothing, pf->atr_sample_rate is non-zero so i40e_atr() would proceed
but the root cause is the same:
toggling ATR via ethtool private flags doesn't trigger a ring reset, so
fd_ena can be stale.
Properly fixing this would mean triggering a reset when ATR is
re-enabled. The reset calls i40e_configure_tx_ring(), which re-evaluates
fd_ena based on the current flag state so fd_ena would be set to 1 since
I40E_FLAG_FD_ATR_ENA is now on.
What do you think about addressing this as a follow-up patch on top of
this series? Since it's a pre-existing issue, it feels like it belongs
as a separate fix rather than being mixed into this refactor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 9:38 [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level mheib
2026-07-01 9:38 ` [PATCH iwl-next v3 2/2] i40e: add devlink parameter for Flow Director ATR sample rate mheib
2026-07-08 14:36 ` Simon Horman
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] i40e: move ATR sample rate from ring to PF level Simon Horman
2026-07-20 11:36 ` mohammad heib [this message]
2026-07-21 12:44 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acb60edf-0be5-4719-8f13-00cdbd1bb491@redhat.com \
--to=mheib@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox