public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jan Hoffmann <jan@3e8.eu>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add quirk for ZOERAX SFP-2.5G-T
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:10:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <achR3vHgO1feCZje@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58089a15-61e4-4899-b74f-2f5a495a206c@3e8.eu>

On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 09:02:34PM +0100, Jan Hoffmann wrote:
> On 2026-03-28 at 04:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:35:58 +0100 Jan Hoffmann wrote:
> > > This is a 2.5G copper module which appears to be based on a Motorcomm
> > > YT8821 PHY. There doesn't seem to be a usable way to to access the PHY
> > > (I2C address 0x56 provides only read-only C22 access, and Rollball is
> > > also not working).
> > > 
> > > The module does not report the correct extended compliance code for
> > > 2.5GBase-T, and instead claims to support SONET OC-48 and Fibre Channel:
> > > 
> > >    Identifier          : 0x03 (SFP)
> > >    Extended identifier : 0x04 (GBIC/SFP defined by 2-wire interface ID)
> > >    Connector           : 0x07 (LC)
> > >    Transceiver codes   : 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x40 0x40 0x04 0x00 0x00
> > >    Transceiver type    : FC: Multimode, 50um (M5)
> > >    Encoding            : 0x05 (SONET Scrambled)
> > >    BR Nominal          : 2500MBd
> > > 
> > > Despite this, the kernel still sets 2500Base-X as interface mode based
> > > on the (incorrect) nominal signaling rate.
> > > 
> > > However, it is also necessary to disable auto-negotiation for the module
> > > to actually work. Thus, create a SFP quirk to do this.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Hoffmann <jan@3e8.eu>
> > > ---
> > > Note: I'm not quite sure "sfp_quirk_disable_autoneg" is enough here, or
> > > if it would be appropriate to use the full "sfp_quirk_oem_2_5g" quirk
> > > due to the not really correct compliance code / nominal signaling rate.
> > 
> > I'm no SFP expert but just going by the naming I strongly suspect that
> > the module is the same hardware as "SFP-2.5G-T" from "FS", so keeping
> > quirks consistent makes sense?
> Based on commit e27aca3760c0 ("net: sfp: enhance quirk for Fibrestore 2.5G
> copper SFP module"), the FS module uses an RTL8221B PHY, so it is different
> hardware. And it also supports the Rollball protocol for PHY access, unlike
> this Zoerax module.
> 
> From the existing quirks, the only valid alternative I see for the Zoerax
> module would be "sfp_quirk_oem_2_5g" (which also sets the additional bits
> for 2500Base-T link mode and explicitly enables 2500Base-X interface mode).
> But as that is not strictly necessary for making this particular module
> work, I am unsure if using this quirk would be appropriate.

See commit 50e96acbe11667b6fe9d99e1348c6c224b2f11dd which added this
function. This was for an OEM SFP-2.5G-T where the PHY was similarly
inaccessible, can only run at 2500base-X without inband and offers
2500Base-T connectivity.

This is basically the same as your Zoerax module.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-28 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 16:35 [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add quirk for ZOERAX SFP-2.5G-T Jan Hoffmann
2026-03-28  3:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-28 20:02   ` Jan Hoffmann
2026-03-28 22:10     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=achR3vHgO1feCZje@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan@3e8.eu \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox