From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] igb: Retrieve Tx timestamp directly from interrupt
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 14:54:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad66d19c-be7b-4df3-8e4c-d57a08782df4@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0rlm22a.fsf@jax.kurt.home>
Dear Kurt, dear Sebastian,
Thank you for your replies.
Am 15.08.25 um 10:17 schrieb Kurt Kanzenbach:
> On Fri Aug 15 2025, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am 15.08.25 um 08:50 schrieb Kurt Kanzenbach:
>>> Retrieve Tx timestamp directly from interrupt handler.
>>>
>>> The current implementation uses schedule_work() which is executed by the
>>> system work queue to retrieve Tx timestamps. This increases latency and can
>>> lead to timeouts in case of heavy system load.
>>>
>>> Therefore, fetch the timestamp directly from the interrupt handler.
>>>
>>> The work queue code stays for the Intel 82576. Tested on Intel i210.
>>
>> Excuse my ignorance, I do not understand the first sentence in the last
>> line. Is it because the driver support different models? Why not change
>> it for Intel 82576 too?
>
> Yes, the driver supports lots of different NIC(s). AFAICS Intel 82576 is
> the only one which does not use time sync interrupts. Probably it does
> not have this feature. Therefore, the 82576 needs to schedule a work
> queue item.
Should you resend, it’d be great if you mentioned that. (Sebastian
confirmed it.)
>> Do you have a reproducer for the issue, so others can test.
>
> Yeah, I do have a reproducer:
>
> - Run ptp4l with 40ms tx timeout (--tx_timestamp_timeout)
> - Run periodic RT tasks (e.g. with SCHED_FIFO 1) with run time of
> 50-100ms per CPU core
>
> This leads to sporadic error messages from ptp4l such as "increasing
> tx_timestamp_timeout or increasing kworker priority may correct this
> issue, but a driver bug likely causes it"
>
> However, increasing the kworker priority is not an option, simply
> because this kworker is doing non-related PTP work items as well.
>
> As the time sync interrupt already signals that the Tx timestamp is
> available, there's no need to schedule a work item in this case. I might
> have missed something though. But my testing looked good. The warn_on
> never triggered.
Great. Maybe add that too, as, at least for me, realtime stuff is
something I do not do, so pointers would help me.
>>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
>>> index c3f4f7cd264e9b2ff70f03b580f95b15b528028c..102ca32e8979fa3203fc2ea36eac456f1943cfca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
>>> @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ int igb_ptp_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev,
>>> int igb_ptp_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev,
>>> struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>> +void igb_ptp_tx_tstamp_event(struct igb_adapter *adapter);
>>> void igb_set_flag_queue_pairs(struct igb_adapter *, const u32);
>>> unsigned int igb_get_max_rss_queues(struct igb_adapter *);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_IGB_HWMON
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> index a9a7a94ae61e93aa737b0103e00580e73601d62b..8ab6e52cb839bbb698007a74462798faaaab0071 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> @@ -7080,7 +7080,7 @@ static void igb_tsync_interrupt(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>>>
>>> if (tsicr & E1000_TSICR_TXTS) {
>>> /* retrieve hardware timestamp */
>>> - schedule_work(&adapter->ptp_tx_work);
>>> + igb_ptp_tx_tstamp_event(adapter);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (tsicr & TSINTR_TT0)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
>>> index a7876882aeaf2b2a7fb9ec6ff5c83d8a1b06008a..20ecafecc60557353f8cc5ab505030246687c8e4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
>>> @@ -796,6 +796,28 @@ static int igb_ptp_verify_pin(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, unsigned int pin,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * igb_ptp_tx_tstamp_event
>>> + * @adapter: pointer to igb adapter
>>> + *
>>> + * This function checks the TSYNCTXCTL valid bit and stores the Tx hardware
>>> + * timestamp at the current skb.
>>> + **/
>>> +void igb_ptp_tx_tstamp_event(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>>> + u32 tsynctxctl;
>>> +
>>> + if (!adapter->ptp_tx_skb)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + tsynctxctl = rd32(E1000_TSYNCTXCTL);
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(tsynctxctl & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_VALID)))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + igb_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(adapter);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * igb_ptp_tx_work
>>> * @work: pointer to work struct
>>
>> The diff looks fine.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-15 6:50 [PATCH iwl-next] igb: Retrieve Tx timestamp directly from interrupt Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-15 7:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2025-08-15 8:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-15 8:17 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-15 12:54 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2025-08-15 16:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-15 13:58 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-08-16 9:06 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-18 12:24 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-19 6:09 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-19 14:50 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-20 6:54 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-19 23:31 ` Jacob Keller
2025-08-20 7:56 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-20 20:29 ` Jacob Keller
2025-08-21 7:50 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-21 11:38 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-21 12:59 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-21 14:08 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-08-21 14:51 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2025-08-19 23:24 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad66d19c-be7b-4df3-8e4c-d57a08782df4@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).