public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Rishikesh Jethwani <rjethwani@purestorage.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
	mbloch@nvidia.com, borisp@nvidia.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, leon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/6] tls: add hardware offload key update support
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 22:59:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adQeoGH8qmhhCSal@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402235511.664801-6-rjethwani@purestorage.com>

2026-04-02, 17:55:10 -0600, Rishikesh Jethwani wrote:
> During a TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate the NIC key cannot be replaced immediately
> if previously encrypted HW records are awaiting ACK. start_rekey sets
> up a temporary SW context with the new key and redirects sendmsg through
> tls_sw_sendmsg_locked. When no records are pending, complete_rekey runs
> inline during setsockopt. Otherwise, clean_acked sets REKEY_READY once
> all old-key records are ACKed, and the next sendmsg calls complete_rekey.
> complete_rekey flushes remaining SW records, reinstalls HW offload at
> the current write_seq, and frees the temporary context.
> 
> If another KeyUpdate arrives while a rekey is already pending,
> start_rekey just re-keys the existing SW AEAD in place.
> 
> If complete_rekey fails (tls_dev_add or crypto_aead_setkey),
> we stay in SW mode (REKEY_FAILED) until a subsequent rekey
> succeeds, while maintaining TLS_HW configuration.
> 
> Tested on Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx (Crypto Enabled) with multiple
> TLS 1.3 key update cycles.

Something here doesn't seem to work. I have a very simple
client/server pair where one side just loops doing large send()s and
does a rekey (send keyupdate + change key) every N iterations (I've
set N large enough that it goes about 5 seconds between rekeys), and
the other receives all the data and changes its RX key when it sees a
keyupdate. If both sides are doing SW, it works. If I configure either
side to use offload, decrypt fails after the rekey unless I add a
small sleep() just after changing keys on the TX side.

-- 
Sabrina

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 23:55 [PATCH net-next v12 0/6] tls: Add TLS 1.3 hardware offload support Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] net: tls: reject TLS 1.3 offload in chcr_ktls and nfp drivers Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] net/mlx5e: add TLS 1.3 hardware offload support Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] tls: " Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] tls: split tls_set_sw_offload into init and finalize stages Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] tls: add hardware offload key update support Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-04-06 20:59   ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2026-04-02 23:55 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] selftests: net: add TLS hardware offload test Rishikesh Jethwani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adQeoGH8qmhhCSal@krikkit \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjethwani@purestorage.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox